The list of alerts

The page displays a list of all alerts of monitoring in the Deckhouse Kubernetes Platform.

Alerts are grouped by modules. To the right of the alert name, there are icons indicating the minimum DKP edition in which the alert is available, and the alert severity.

For each alert, a summary is provided, and if available, the detailed alert description can be viewed by expanding it.

Module admission-policy-engine

D8AdmissionPolicyEngineNotBootstrapped CE S7

Admission policy engine module hasn't been bootstrapped for 10 minutes.

Admission policy engine module couldn’t bootstrap. Please check that the module’s components are up and running: kubectl get pods -n d8-admission-policy-engine. Also, it makes sense to check relevant logs in case there are missing constraint templates or not all CRD were created: kubectl logs -n d8-system -lapp=deckhouse --tail=1000 | grep admission-policy-engine
OperationPolicyViolation CE S7

At least one object violates configured cluster Operation Policies.

You have configured OperationPolicy for the cluster.

You can find existing objects violating policies by running count by (violating_namespace, violating_kind, violating_name, violation_msg) (d8_gatekeeper_exporter_constraint_violations{violation_enforcement="deny",source_type="OperationPolicy"}) prometheus query or via the Admission policy engine Grafana dashboard.
PodSecurityStandardsViolation CE S7

At least one pod violates configured cluster pod security standards.

You have configured pod security standards (https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/security/pod-security-standards/).

You can find already Running pods which are violate standards by running count by (violating_namespace, violating_name, violation_msg) (d8_gatekeeper_exporter_constraint_violations{violation_enforcement="deny",violating_namespace=~".*",violating_kind="Pod",source_type="PSS"}) prometheus query or via the Admission policy engine grafana dashboard.
SecurityPolicyViolation CE S7

At least one object violates configured cluster Security Policies.

You have configured SecurityPolicy for the cluster.

You can find existing objects violating policies by running count by (violating_namespace, violating_kind, violating_name, violation_msg) (d8_gatekeeper_exporter_constraint_violations{violation_enforcement="deny",source_type="SecurityPolicy"}) prometheus query or via the Admission policy engine Grafana dashboard.

Module cert-manager

CertmanagerCertificateExpired CE S4

Certificate expired

Certificate {{$labels.exported_namespace}}/{{$labels.name}} expired
CertmanagerCertificateExpiredSoon CE S4

Certificate will expire soon

The certificate {{$labels.exported_namespace}}/{{$labels.name}} will expire in less than 2 weeks
CertmanagerCertificateOrderErrors CE S5

Certmanager cannot order a certificate.

Cermanager receives responses with the code {{ $labels.status }} on requesting {{ $labels.scheme }}://{{ $labels.host }}{{ $labels.path }}.

It can affect certificates ordering and prolongation. Check certmanager logs for more info. kubectl -n d8-cert-manager logs -l app=cert-manager -c cert-manager

Module chrony

NodeTimeOutOfSync CE S5

Node's {{$labels.node}} clock is drifting.

Node’s {{$labels.node}} time is out of sync from ntp server by {{ $value }} seconds.
NTPDaemonOnNodeDoesNotSynchronizeTime CE S5
NTP daemon on node {{$labels.node}} have not synchronized time for too long.
1. check if Chrony pod is running on the node by executing the following command:
  
  ‘kubectl -n d8-chrony –field-selector spec.nodeName=”{{$labels.node}}” get pods’
2. check the Chrony daemon’s status by executing the following command:
  
  ‘kubectl -n d8-chrony exec -- /opt/chrony-static/bin/chronyc sources'
3. Correct the time synchronization problems:
  
  correct network problems:
  
  provide availability to upstream time synchronization servers defined in the module configuration;
  
  eliminate large packet loss and excessive latency to upstream time synchronization servers.
  
  Modify NTP servers list defined in the module configuration.

Module cloud-provider-yandex

D8YandexNatInstanceConnectionsQuotaUtilization CE S4

Yandex nat-instance connections quota utilization is above 85% over the last 5 minutes.

Nat-instance connections quota should be increased by Yandex technical support.

NATInstanceWithDeprecatedAvailabilityZone CE S9

NAT Instance {{ $labels.name }} is in deprecated availability zone.

Availability zone ru-central1-c is deprecated by Yandex.Cloud. You should migrate your NAT Instance to ru-central1-a or ru-central1-b zone.

You can use the following instructions to migrate.

IMPORTANT The following actions are destructive changes and cause downtime (typically a several tens of minutes, also it depending on the response time of Yandex Cloud).

Migrate NAT Instance.

Get providerClusterConfiguration.withNATInstance:
```
 kubectl -n d8-system exec -ti svc/deckhouse-leader -c deckhouse -- deckhouse-controller module values -g cloud-provider-yandex -o json | jq -c | jq '.cloudProviderYandex.internal.providerClusterConfiguration.withNATInstance'
```
1. If you specified withNATInstance.natInstanceInternalAddress and/or withNATInstance.internalSubnetID in providerClusterConfiguration, you need to remove them with the following command:
```
 kubectl -n d8-system exec -ti svc/deckhouse-leader -c deckhouse -- deckhouse-controller edit provider-cluster-configuration
```
2. If you specified withNATInstance.externalSubnetID and/or withNATInstance.natInstanceExternalAddress in providerClusterConfiguration, you need to change these to the appropriate values.
  
  You can get address and subnetID from Yandex.Cloud console or with CLI
  
  Change withNATInstance.externalSubnetID and withNATInstance.natInstanceExternalAddress with the following command:
```
 kubectl -n d8-system exec -ti svc/deckhouse-leader -c deckhouse -- deckhouse-controller edit provider-cluster-configuration
```

Run the appropriate edition and version of the Deckhouse installer container on the local machine (change the container registry address if necessary) and do converge.

Get edition and version of the Deckhouse:

 DH_VERSION=$(kubectl -n d8-system get deployment deckhouse -o jsonpath='{.metadata.annotations.core\.deckhouse\.io\/version}')
 DH_EDITION=$(kubectl -n d8-system get deployment deckhouse -o jsonpath='{.metadata.annotations.core\.deckhouse\.io\/edition}' | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')
 echo "DH_VERSION=$DH_VERSION DH_EDITION=$DH_EDITION"

Run the installer:

 docker run --pull=always -it -v "$HOME/.ssh/:/tmp/.ssh/" registry.deckhouse.io/deckhouse/${DH_EDITION}/install:${DH_VERSION} bash

Do converge:

 dhctl converge --ssh-agent-private-keys=/tmp/.ssh/<SSH_KEY_FILENAME> --ssh-user=<USERNAME> --ssh-host <MASTER-NODE-0-HOST>

Update route table

Get route table name

 kubectl -n d8-system exec -ti svc/deckhouse-leader -c deckhouse -- deckhouse-controller module values -g cloud-provider-yandex -o json | jq -c | jq '.global.clusterConfiguration.cloud.prefix'

Get NAT Instance name:

 kubectl -n d8-system exec -ti svc/deckhouse-leader -c deckhouse -- deckhouse-controller module values -g cloud-provider-yandex -o json | jq -c | jq '.cloudProviderYandex.internal.providerDiscoveryData.natInstanceName'

Get NAT Instance internal IP

 yc compute instance list | grep -e "INTERNAL IP" -e <NAT_INSTANCE_NAME_FROM_PREVIOUS_STEP>

Update route

 yc vpc route-table update --name <ROUTE_TABLE_NAME_FROM_PREVIOUS_STEP> --route "destination=0.0.0.0/0,next-hop=<NAT_INSTANCE_INTERNAL_IP_FROM_PREVIOUS_STEP>"

NodeGroupNodeWithDeprecatedAvailabilityZone CE S9

NodeGroup {{ $labels.node_group }} contains Nodes with deprecated availability zone.

Availability zone ru-central1-c is deprecated by Yandex.Cloud. You should migrate your Nodes, Disks and LoadBalancers to ru-central1-a, ru-central1-b or ru-central1-d (introduced in v1.56). To check which Nodes should be migrated, use kubectl get node -l "topology.kubernetes.io/zone=ru-central1-c" command.

You can use Yandex Migration Guide (mostly applicable to the `ru-central1-d’ zone only).

IMPORTANT You cannot migrate public IP addresses between zones. Check out the Yandex Migration Guide for details.

Module cni-cilium

CiliumAgentEndpointsNotReady CE S4

More than half of all known Endpoints are not ready in agent {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.pod }}.

Check what’s going on: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} logs {{ $labels.pod }}
CiliumAgentMapPressureCritical CE S4

eBPF map {{ $labels.map_name }} is more than 90% full in agent {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.pod }}.

We’ve reached resource limit of eBPF maps. Consult with vendor for possible remediation steps.
CiliumAgentMetricNotFound CE S4
Some of the metrics are not coming from the agent {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.pod }}.
Use the following commands to check what’s going on:
- kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} logs {{ $labels.pod }}
- kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} exec -ti {{ $labels.pod }} cilium-health status
We need to cross-check the metrics with the neighboring agent. Also the absence of metrics is an indirect sign that new pods cannot be created on the node because of the inability to connect to the agent. It is important to get a more specific way of determining the above situation and create a more accurate alert for the inability to connect new pods to the agent.
CiliumAgentPolicyImportErrors CE S4

Agent {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.pod }} fails to import policies.

Check what’s going on: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} logs {{ $labels.pod }}
CiliumAgentUnreachableHealthEndpoints CE S4

Some node's health endpoints are not reachable by agent {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.pod }}.

Check what’s going on: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} logs {{ $labels.pod }}
CniCiliumNonStandardVXLANPortFound CE S4

There is non-standard VXLAN port in Cilium config

There is non-standard VXLAN port in Cilium config: {{$labels.port}} does not fit the recommended range (4298 if the virtualization module enabled or 4299 for regular deckhouse setup).

Consider configuring the tunnel-port parameter in cilium-configmap ConfigMap (d8-cni-cilium namespace) according the recommended range. If you know why you need the non-standard port, just ignore the alert.
CniCiliumOrphanEgressGatewayPolicyFound EE S4

Found orphan EgressGatewayPolicy with irrelevant EgressGateway name

There is orphan EgressGatewayPolicy in the cluster: with the name: {{$labels.name}} which has irrelevant EgressGateway name.

It is recommended to check EgressGateway name in EgressGatewayPolicy resource: {{$labels.egressgateway}}

Module control-plane-manager

D8ControlPlaneManagerPodNotRunning CE S6

Controller Pod not running on Node {{ $labels.node }}

Pod d8-control-plane-manager fails or not scheduled on Node {{ $labels.node }}

Consider checking state of the kube-system/d8-control-plane-manager DaemonSet and its Pods: kubectl -n kube-system get daemonset,pod --selector=app=d8-control-plane-manager
D8EtcdDatabaseHighFragmentationRatio CE S7
etcd database size in use is less than 50% of the actual allocated storage, indicating potential fragmentation, and the total storage size exceeds 75% of the configured quota.
The etcd database size in use on instance {{ $labels.instance }} is less than 50% of the actual allocated disk space, indicating potential fragmentation

Possible solutions:
- You can do defragmentation. Use the following command: kubectl -n kube-system exec -ti etcd-{{ $labels.node }} -- /usr/bin/etcdctl --cacert /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt --cert /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt --key /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.key --endpoints https://127.0.0.1:2379/ defrag --command-timeout=30s
D8EtcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth CE S4

etcd cluster database growing very fast.

Predicting that the etcd database will run out of disk space in the next 1 day on instance {{ $labels.instance }} based on 6h growth rate.

Please check and take action as it might be disruptive.
D8KubeEtcdDatabaseSizeCloseToTheLimit CE S3
etcd db size is close to the limit
The size of the etcd database on {{ $labels.node }} has almost exceeded. Possibly there are a lot of events (e.g. Pod evictions) or a high number of other resources are created in the cluster recently.

Possible solutions:
- You can do defragmentation. Use next command: kubectl -n kube-system exec -ti etcd-{{ $labels.node }} -- /usr/bin/etcdctl --cacert /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt --cert /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt --key /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.key --endpoints https://127.0.0.1:2379/ defrag --command-timeout=30s
- Increase node memory. Begin from 24 GB quota-backend-bytes will be increased on 1G every extra 8 GB node memory. For example: Node Memory quota-backend-bytes 16GB 2147483648 (2GB) 24GB 3221225472 (3GB) 32GB 4294967296 (4GB) 40GB 5368709120 (5GB) 48GB 6442450944 (6GB) 56GB 7516192768 (7GB) 64GB 8589934592 (8GB) 72GB 8589934592 (8GB) ….
D8KubernetesVersionIsDeprecated CE S7

Kubernetes version "{{ $labels.k8s_version }}" is deprecated

Current kubernetes version “{{ $labels.k8s_version }}” is deprecated, and its support will be removed within 6 months

Please migrate to the next kubernetes version (at least 1.27)

Check how to update the Kubernetes version in the cluster here - https://deckhouse.io/documentation/deckhouse-faq.html#how-do-i-upgrade-the-kubernetes-version-in-a-cluster
D8NeedDecreaseEtcdQuotaBackendBytes CE S6
Deckhouse considers that quota-backend-bytes should be reduced.
Deckhouse can increase quota-backend-bytes only. It happens when control-plane nodes memory was reduced. If is true, you should set quota-backend-bytes manually with controlPlaneManager.etcd.maxDbSize configuration parameter. Before set new value, please check current DB usage on every control-plane node:
for pod in $(kubectl get pod -n kube-system -l component=etcd,tier=control-plane -o name); do kubectl -n kube-system exec -ti "$pod" -- /usr/bin/etcdctl --cacert /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt --cert /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt --key /etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.key endpoint status -w json | jq --arg a "$pod" -r '.[0].Status.dbSize / 1024 / 1024 | tostring | $a + ": " + . + " MB"'; done
Recommendations:
- controlPlaneManager.etcd.maxDbSize maximum value is 8 GB.
- If control-plane nodes have less than 24 GB, use 2 GB for controlPlaneManager.etcd.maxDbSize.
- For >= 24GB increase value on 1GB every extra 8 GB. Node Memory quota-backend-bytes 16GB 2147483648 (2GB) 24GB 3221225472 (3GB) 32GB 4294967296 (4GB) 40GB 5368709120 (5GB) 48GB 6442450944 (6GB) 56GB 7516192768 (7GB) 64GB 8589934592 (8GB) 72GB 8589934592 (8GB) ….
KubernetesVersionEndOfLife CE S4

Kubernetes version "{{ $labels.k8s_version }}" has reached End Of Life.

Current kubernetes version “{{ $labels.k8s_version }}” support will be removed in the next Deckhouse release (1.58).

Please migrate to the next kubernetes version (at least 1.24) as soon as possible.

Check how to update the Kubernetes version in the cluster here - https://deckhouse.io/documentation/deckhouse-faq.html#how-do-i-upgrade-the-kubernetes-version-in-a-cluster

Module documentation

ModuleConfigDeprecated CE S9

Deprecated ModuleConfig was found.

The module deckhouse-web was renamed to the documentation.

The new ModuleConfig documentation was generated automatically. Please, remove deprecated ModuleConfig deckhouse-web from the CI deploy process and delete it: kubectl delete mc deckhouse-web.

Module extended-monitoring

CertificateSecretExpired CE S8
Certificate expired
Certificate in secret {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.name}} expired.
- If the certificate is manually managed, upload a newer one.
- If the certificate is managed by cert-manager, try inspecting certificate resource, the recommended course of action:
  
  Retrieve certificate name from the secret: cert=$(kubectl get secret -n {{$labels.namespace}} {{$labels.name}} -o 'jsonpath={.metadata.annotations.cert-manager\.io/certificate-name}')
  
  View the status of the Certificate and try to figure out why it is not updated: kubectl describe cert -m {{$labels.namespace}} "$cert"
CertificateSecretExpiredSoon CE S8
Certificate will expire soon.
Certificate in secret {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.name}} will expire in less than 2 weeks
- If the certificate is manually managed, upload a newer one.
- If certificate is managed by cert-manager, try inspecting certificate resource, the recommended course of action:
  
  Retrieve certificate name from the secret: cert=$(kubectl get secret -n {{$labels.namespace}} {{$labels.name}} -o 'jsonpath={.metadata.annotations.cert-manager\.io/certificate-name}')
  
  View the status of the Certificate and try to figure out why it is not updated: kubectl describe cert -n {{$labels.namespace}} "$cert"
CronJobAuthenticationFailure CE S7

Unable to login to the container registry using imagePullSecrets for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

Unable to login to the container registry using imagePullSecrets for the {{ $labels.image }} image in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the CronJob {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
CronJobAuthorizationFailure CE S7

Insufficient privileges to pull the {{ $labels.image }} image using the imagePullSecrets specified.

Insufficient privileges to pull the {{ $labels.image }} image using the imagePullSecrets specified in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the CronJob {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
CronJobBadImageFormat CE S7

The {{ $labels.image }} image has incorrect name.

You should check whether the {{ $labels.image }} image name is spelled correctly: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the CronJob {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
CronJobFailed CE S5
Job {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.job_name}} failed in CronJob {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.owner_name}}.
CronJobImageAbsent CE S7

The {{ $labels.image }} image is missing from the registry.

You should check whether the {{ $labels.image }} image is available: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the CronJob {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
CronJobRegistryUnavailable CE S7

The container registry is not available for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

The container registry is not available for the {{ $labels.image }} image: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the CronJob {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
CronJobSchedulingError CE S6

CronJob {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.cronjob}} failed to schedule on time.

CronJob {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.cronjob}} failed to schedule on time. Schedule: “{{ printf “kube_cronjob_info{namespace="%s", cronjob="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.cronjob | query | first | label “schedule” }}” Last schedule time: {{ printf “kube_cronjob_status_last_schedule_time{namespace="%s", cronjob="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.cronjob | query | first | value | humanizeTimestamp }}% Projected next schedule time: {{ printf “kube_cronjob_next_schedule_time{namespace="%s", cronjob="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.cronjob | query | first | value | humanizeTimestamp }}%
CronJobUnknownError CE S7

An unknown error occurred for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

An unknown error occurred for the {{ $labels.image }} image in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the CronJob {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.

Refer to the exporter logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app=image-availability-exporter -c image-availability-exporter
D8CertExporterPodIsNotReady CE S8
The cert-exporter Pod is NOT Ready.
The recommended course of action:
1. Retrieve details of the Deployment: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe deploy cert-exporter
2. View the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app=cert-exporter
D8CertExporterPodIsNotRunning CE S8
The cert-exporter Pod is NOT Running.
The recommended course of action:
1. Retrieve details of the Deployment: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe deploy cert-exporter
2. View the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app=cert-exporter
D8CertExporterTargetAbsent CE S8

There is no cert-exporter target in Prometheus.

Check the Pod status: kubectl -n d8-monitoring get pod -l app=cert-exporter

Or check the Pod logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app=cert-exporter -c cert-exporter
D8CertExporterTargetDown CE S8

Prometheus cannot scrape the cert-exporter metrics.

Check the Pod status: kubectl -n d8-monitoring get pod -l app=cert-exporter

Or check the Pod logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app=cert-exporter -c cert-exporter
D8ImageAvailabilityExporterMalfunctioning CE S8

image-availability-exporter has crashed.

The image-availability-exporter failed to perform any checks for the availability of images in the registry for over 20 minutes.

You need to analyze its logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app=image-availability-exporter -c image-availability-exporter
D8ImageAvailabilityExporterPodIsNotReady CE S8
The image-availability-exporter Pod is NOT Ready.
The images listed in the image field are not checked for availability in the container registry.

The recommended course of action:
1. Retrieve details of the Deployment: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe deploy image-availability-exporter
2. View the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app=image-availability-exporter
D8ImageAvailabilityExporterPodIsNotRunning CE S8
The image-availability-exporter Pod is NOT Running.
The images listed in the image field are not checked for availability in the container registry.

The recommended course of action:
1. Retrieve details of the Deployment: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe deploy image-availability-exporter
2. View the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app=image-availability-exporter
D8ImageAvailabilityExporterTargetAbsent CE S8

There is no image-availability-exporter target in Prometheus.

Check the Pod status: kubectl -n d8-monitoring get pod -l app=image-availability-exporter

Or check the Pod logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app=image-availability-exporter -c image-availability-exporter
D8ImageAvailabilityExporterTargetDown CE S8

Prometheus cannot scrape the image-availability-exporter metrics.

Check the Pod status: kubectl -n d8-monitoring get pod -l app=image-availability-exporter

Or check the Pod logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app=image-availability-exporter -c image-availability-exporter
DaemonSetAuthenticationFailure CE S7

Unable to login to the container registry using imagePullSecrets for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

Unable to login to the container registry using imagePullSecrets for the {{ $labels.image }} image in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the DaemonSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DaemonSetAuthorizationFailure CE S7

Insufficient privileges to pull the {{ $labels.image }} image using the imagePullSecrets specified.

Insufficient privileges to pull the {{ $labels.image }} image using the imagePullSecrets specified in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the DaemonSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DaemonSetBadImageFormat CE S7

The {{ $labels.image }} image has incorrect name.

You should check whether the {{ $labels.image }} image name is spelled correctly: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the DaemonSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DaemonSetImageAbsent CE S7

The {{ $labels.image }} image is missing from the registry.

You should check whether the {{ $labels.image }} image is available: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the DaemonSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DaemonSetRegistryUnavailable CE S7

The container registry is not available for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

The container registry is not available for the {{ $labels.image }} image: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the DaemonSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DaemonSetUnknownError CE S7

An unknown error occurred for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

An unknown error occurred for the {{ $labels.image }} image in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the DaemonSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.

Refer to the exporter logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app=image-availability-exporter -c image-availability-exporter
DeploymentAuthenticationFailure CE S7

Unable to login to the container registry using imagePullSecrets for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

Unable to login to the container registry using imagePullSecrets for the {{ $labels.image }} image in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the Deployment {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DeploymentAuthorizationFailure CE S7

Insufficient privileges to pull the {{ $labels.image }} image using the imagePullSecrets specified.

Insufficient privileges to pull the {{ $labels.image }} image using the imagePullSecrets specified in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the Deployment {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DeploymentBadImageFormat CE S7

The {{ $labels.image }} image has incorrect name.

You should check whether the {{ $labels.image }} image name is spelled correctly: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the Deployment {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DeploymentImageAbsent CE S7

The {{ $labels.image }} image is missing from the registry.

You should check whether the {{ $labels.image }} image is available: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the Deployment {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DeploymentRegistryUnavailable CE S7

The container registry is not available for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

The container registry is not available for the {{ $labels.image }} image: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the Deployment {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
DeploymentUnknownError CE S7

An unknown error occurred for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

An unknown error occurred for the {{ $labels.image }} image in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the Deployment {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.

Refer to the exporter logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app=image-availability-exporter -c image-availability-exporter
ExtendedMonitoringDeprecatatedAnnotation CE S4
Deprecated extended-monitoring.flant.com/enabled annotations are used in cluster. Migrate to extended-monitoring.deckhouse.io/enabled label ASAP. Check d8_deprecated_legacy_annotation metric in Prometheus to get list of all usages.
ExtendedMonitoringTargetDown CE S5
Extended-monitoring is down
Pod with extended-monitoring exporter is unavailable.

Following alerts will not be fired:
- About lack of the space and inodes on volumes
- CPU overloads and throttling of containers
- 500 errors on ingress
- Replicas quantity of controllers (alerts about the insufficient amount of replicas of Deployment, StatefulSet, DaemonSet)
- And others
To debug, execute the following commands:
1. kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe deploy extended-monitoring-exporter
2. kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app=extended-monitoring-exporter

IngressResponses5xx CE S4

URL {{$labels.vhost}}{{$labels.location}} on Ingress {{$labels.ingress}} has more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_ingress_threshold{threshold="5xx-critical", namespace="%s", ingress="%s"}" $labels.namespace $labels.ingress | query | first | value }}% 5xx responses from backend.

URL {{$labels.vhost}}{{$labels.location}} on Ingress {{$labels.ingress}} with Service name “{{$labels.service}}” and port “{{$labels.service_port}}” has more than {{ printf “extended_monitoring_ingress_threshold{threshold="5xx-critical", namespace="%s", ingress="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.ingress

query

first

value }}% 5xx responses from backend.

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%

IngressResponses5xx CE S5

URL {{$labels.vhost}}{{$labels.location}} on Ingress {{$labels.ingress}} has more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_ingress_threshold{threshold="5xx-warning", namespace="%s", ingress="%s"}" $labels.namespace $labels.ingress | query | first | value }}% 5xx responses from backend.

URL {{$labels.vhost}}{{$labels.location}} on Ingress {{$labels.ingress}} with Service name “{{$labels.service}}” and port “{{$labels.service_port}}” has more than {{ printf “extended_monitoring_ingress_threshold{threshold="5xx-warning", namespace="%s", ingress="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.ingress

query

first

value }}% 5xx responses from backend.

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%

KubernetesDaemonSetNotUpToDate CE S9
There are {{ .Value }} outdated Pods in the {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.daemonset }} DaemonSet for the last 15 minutes.
There are {{ .Value }} outdated Pods in the {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.daemonset }} DaemonSet for the last 15 minutes.

The recommended course of action:
1. Check the DaemonSet’s status: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} get ds {{ $labels.daemonset }}
2. Analyze the DaemonSet’s description: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} describe ds {{ $labels.daemonset }}
3. If the Number of Nodes Scheduled with Up-to-date Pods parameter does not match Current Number of Nodes Scheduled, check the DaemonSet’s updateStrategy: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} get ds {{ $labels.daemonset }} -o json | jq '.spec.updateStrategy'
4. Note that if the OnDelete updateStrategy is set, the DaemonSet gets only updated when Pods are deleted.

KubernetesDaemonSetReplicasUnavailable CE S5

Count of available replicas in DaemonSet {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.daemonset}} is at zero.

List of unavailable Pod(s): {{range $index, $result := (printf “(max by (namespace, pod) (kube_pod_status_ready{namespace="%s", condition!="true"} == 1)) * on (namespace, pod) kube_controller_pod{namespace="%s", controller_type="DaemonSet", controller_name="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.namespace $labels.daemonset

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

This command might help figuring out problematic nodes given you are aware where the DaemonSet should be scheduled in the first place (using label selector for pods might be of help, too):

kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pod -ojson | jq -r '.items[] | select(.metadata.ownerReferences[] | select(.name =="{{$labels.daemonset}}")) | select(.status.phase != "Running" or ([ .status.conditions[] | select(.type == "Ready" and .status == "False") ] | length ) == 1 ) | .spec.affinity.nodeAffinity.requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution.nodeSelectorTerms[].matchFields[].values[]'

KubernetesDaemonSetReplicasUnavailable CE S6

Count of unavailable replicas in DaemonSet {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.daemonset}} is above threshold.

Count of unavailable replicas in DaemonSet {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.daemonset}} is above threshold. Currently at: {{ .Value }} unavailable replica(s) Threshold at: {{ printf “extended_monitoring_daemonset_threshold{threshold="replicas-not-ready", namespace="%s", daemonset="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.daemonset | query | first | value }} unavailable replica(s)

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

This command might help figuring out problematic nodes given you are aware where the DaemonSet should be scheduled in the first place (using label selector for pods might be of help, too):

kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pod -ojson | jq -r '.items[] | select(.metadata.ownerReferences[] | select(.name =="{{$labels.daemonset}}")) | select(.status.phase != "Running" or ([ .status.conditions[] | select(.type == "Ready" and .status == "False") ] | length ) == 1 ) | .spec.affinity.nodeAffinity.requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution.nodeSelectorTerms[].matchFields[].values[]'

KubernetesDeploymentReplicasUnavailable CE S5

Count of available replicas in Deployment {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.deployment}} is at zero.

List of unavailable Pod(s): {{range $index, $result := (printf “(max by (namespace, pod) (kube_pod_status_ready{namespace="%s", condition!="true"} == 1)) * on (namespace, pod) kube_controller_pod{namespace="%s", controller_type="Deployment", controller_name="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.namespace $labels.deployment

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

KubernetesDeploymentReplicasUnavailable CE S6

Count of unavailable replicas in Deployment {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.deployment}} is violating "spec.strategy.rollingupdate.maxunavailable".

Count of unavailable replicas in Deployment {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.deployment}} is violating “spec.strategy.rollingupdate.maxunavailable”.

Currently at: {{ .Value }} unavailable replica(s) Threshold at: {{ printf “extended_monitoring_deployment_threshold{threshold="replicas-not-ready", namespace="%s", deployment="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.deployment | query | first | value }} unavailable replica(s)

List of unavailable Pod(s): {{range $index, $result := (printf “(max by (namespace, pod) (kube_pod_status_ready{namespace="%s", condition!="true"} == 1)) * on (namespace, pod) kube_controller_pod{namespace="%s", controller_type="Deployment", controller_name="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.namespace $labels.deployment

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

KubernetesStatefulSetReplicasUnavailable CE S5

Count of ready replicas in StatefulSet {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.statefulset}} at zero.

List of unavailable Pod(s): {{range $index, $result := (printf “(max by (namespace, pod) (kube_pod_status_ready{namespace="%s", condition!="true"} == 1)) * on (namespace, pod) kube_controller_pod{namespace="%s", controller_type="StatefulSet", controller_name="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.namespace $labels.deployment

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

KubernetesStatefulSetReplicasUnavailable CE S6

Count of unavailable replicas in StatefulSet {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.statefulset}} above threshold.

Currently at: {{ .Value }} unavailable replica(s) Threshold at: {{ printf “extended_monitoring_statefulset_threshold{threshold="replicas-not-ready", namespace="%s", statefulset="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.statefulset | query | first | value }} unavailable replica(s)

List of unavailable Pod(s): {{range $index, $result := (printf “(max by (namespace, pod) (kube_pod_status_ready{namespace="%s", condition!="true"} == 1)) * on (namespace, pod) kube_controller_pod{namespace="%s", controller_type="StatefulSet", controller_name="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.namespace $labels.deployment

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

LoadAverageHigh CE S4

The load average on the {{ $labels.node }} Node is too high.

For the last 5 minutes, the load average on the {{ $labels.node }} Node has been higher than {{ printf “extended_monitoring_node_threshold{threshold="load-average-per-core-critical", node="%s"}” $labels.node

query

first

value }} per core. There are more processes in the queue than the CPU can handle; probably, some process has created too many threads or child processes, or the CPU is overloaded.

LoadAverageHigh CE S5

The load average on the {{ $labels.node }} Node is too high.

For the last 30 minutes, the load average on the {{ $labels.node }} Node has been higher or equal to {{ printf “extended_monitoring_node_threshold{threshold="load-average-per-core-warning", node="%s"}” $labels.node

query

first

value }} per core. There are more processes in the queue than the CPU can handle; probably, some process has created too many threads or child processes, or the CPU is overloaded.

NodeDiskBytesUsage CE S5
Node disk "{{$labels.device}}" on mountpoint "{{$labels.mountpoint}}" is using more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_node_threshold{threshold="disk-bytes-critical", node="%s"}" $labels.node | query | first | value }}% of storage capacity. Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
NodeDiskBytesUsage CE S6

Node disk "{{$labels.device}}" on mountpoint "{{$labels.mountpoint}}" is using more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_node_threshold{threshold="disk-bytes-warning", node="%s"}" $labels.node | query | first | value }}% of the storage capacity. Currently at: {{ .Value }}%

Node disk “{{$labels.device}}” on mountpoint “{{$labels.mountpoint}}” is using more than {{ printf “extended_monitoring_node_threshold{threshold="disk-bytes-warning", node="%s"}” $labels.node | query | first | value }}% of the storage capacity. Currently at: {{ .Value }}%

Retrieve the disk usage info on the node: `ncdu -x {{$labels.mountpoint}}’

If the output shows high disk usage in the /var/lib/containerd/io.containerd.snapshotter.v1.overlayfs/ directory, use the following command to show the pods with the highest usage: crictl stats -o json | jq '.stats[] | select((.writableLayer.usedBytes.value | tonumber) > 1073741824) | { meta: .attributes.labels, diskUsage: ((.writableLayer.usedBytes.value | tonumber) / 1073741824 * 100 | round / 100 | tostring + " GiB")}'
NodeDiskInodesUsage CE S5
Node disk "{{$labels.device}}" on mountpoint "{{$labels.mountpoint}}" is using more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_node_threshold{threshold="disk-inodes-critical", node="%s"}" $labels.node | query | first | value }}% of storage capacity. Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
NodeDiskInodesUsage CE S6
Node disk "{{$labels.device}}" on mountpoint "{{$labels.mountpoint}}" is using more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_node_threshold{threshold="disk-inodes-warning", node="%s"}" $labels.node | query | first | value }}% of storage capacity. Currently at: {{ .Value }}%

PersistentVolumeClaimBytesUsage CE S4

PersistentVolumeClaim {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.persistentvolumeclaim}} is using more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_pod_threshold{threshold="disk-bytes-critical", namespace="%s", pod="%s"}" $labels.namespace $labels.pod | query | first | value }}% of volume storage capacity.

PersistentVolumeClaim {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.persistentvolumeclaim}} is using more than {{ printf “extended_monitoring_pod_threshold{threshold="disk-bytes-critical", namespace="%s", pod="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.pod | query | first | value }}% of volume storage capacity. Currently at: {{ .Value }}%

PersistentVolumeClaim is used by the following pods: {{range $index, $result := (print “kube_pod_spec_volumes_persistentvolumeclaims_info{namespace=’” $labels.namespace “’, persistentvolumeclaim=’” $labels.persistentvolumeclaim “’}”

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

PersistentVolumeClaimBytesUsage CE S5

PersistentVolumeClaim {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.persistentvolumeclaim}} is using more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_pod_threshold{threshold="disk-bytes-warning", namespace="%s", pod="%s"}" $labels.namespace $labels.pod | query | first | value }}% of volume storage capacity.

PersistentVolumeClaim {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.persistentvolumeclaim}} is using more than {{ printf “extended_monitoring_pod_threshold{threshold="disk-bytes-warning", namespace="%s", pod="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.pod | query | first | value }}% of volume storage capacity. Currently at: {{ .Value }}%

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

PersistentVolumeClaimInodesUsed CE S4

PersistentVolumeClaim {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.persistentvolumeclaim}} is using more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_pod_threshold{threshold="disk-inodes-critical", namespace="%s", pod="%s"}" $labels.namespace $labels.pod | query | first | value }}% of volume inode capacity.

PersistentVolumeClaim {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.persistentvolumeclaim}} is using more than {{ printf “extended_monitoring_pod_threshold{threshold="disk-inodes-critical", namespace="%s", pod="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.pod | query | first | value }}% of volume inode capacity. Currently at: {{ .Value }}%

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

PersistentVolumeClaimInodesUsed CE S5

PersistentVolumeClaim {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.persistentvolumeclaim}} is using more than {{ printf "extended_monitoring_pod_threshold{threshold="disk-inodes-warning", namespace="%s", pod="%s"}" $labels.namespace $labels.pod | query | first | value }}% of volume inode capacity.

PersistentVolumeClaim {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.persistentvolumeclaim}} is using more than {{ printf “extended_monitoring_pod_threshold{threshold="disk-inodes-warning", namespace="%s", pod="%s"}” $labels.namespace $labels.pod | query | first | value }}% of volume inode capacity. Currently at: {{ .Value }}%

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

StatefulSetAuthenticationFailure CE S7

Unable to login to the container registry using imagePullSecrets for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

Unable to login to the container registry using imagePullSecrets for the {{ $labels.image }} image in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the StatefulSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
StatefulSetAuthorizationFailure CE S7

Insufficient privileges to pull the {{ $labels.image }} image using the imagePullSecrets specified.

Insufficient privileges to pull the {{ $labels.image }} image using the imagePullSecrets specified in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the StatefulSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
StatefulSetBadImageFormat CE S7

The {{ $labels.image }} image has incorrect name.

You should check whether the {{ $labels.image }} image name is spelled correctly: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the StatefulSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
StatefulSetImageAbsent CE S7

The {{ $labels.image }} image is missing from the registry.

You should check whether the {{ $labels.image }} image is available: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the StatefulSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
StatefulSetRegistryUnavailable CE S7

The container registry is not available for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

The container registry is not available for the {{ $labels.image }} image: in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the StatefulSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.
StatefulSetUnknownError CE S7

An unknown error occurred for the {{ $labels.image }} image.

An unknown error occurred for the {{ $labels.image }} image in the {{ $labels.namespace }} Namespace; in the StatefulSet {{ $labels.name }} in the {{ $labels.container }} container in the registry.

Refer to the exporter logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app=image-availability-exporter -c image-availability-exporter

Module flow-schema

KubernetesAPFRejectRequests CE S9

APF flow schema d8-serviceaccounts has rejected API requests.

To show APF schema queue requests, use the expr apiserver_flowcontrol_current_inqueue_requests{flow_schema="d8-serviceaccounts"}.

Attention: This is an experimental alert!

Module ingress-nginx

D8NginxIngressKruiseControllerPodIsRestartingTooOften CE S8
Too many kruise controller restarts have been detected in d8-ingress-nginx namespace.
The number of restarts in the last hour: {{ $value }}. Excessive kruise controller restarts indicate that something is wrong. Normally, it should be up and running all the time.

The recommended course of action:
1. Check any events regarding kruise-controller-manager in d8-ingress-nginx namespace in case there were some issues there related to the nodes the manager runs on or memory shortage (OOM): kubectl -n d8-ingress-nginx get events | grep kruise-controller-manager
2. Analyze the controller’s pods’ descriptions to check which containers were restarted and what were the possible reasons (exit codes, etc.): kubectl -n d8-ingress-nginx describe pod -lapp=kruise,control-plane=controller-manager
3. In case kruise container was restarted, list relevant logs of the container to check if there were some meaningful errors there: kubectl -n d8-ingress-nginx logs -lapp=kruise,control-plane=controller-manager -c kruise
DeprecatedGeoIPVersion CE S9

Deprecated GeoIP version 1 is being used in the cluster.

There is an IngressNginxController and/or an Ingress object that utilize(s) Nginx GeoIPv1 module’s variables. The module is deprecated and its support is discontinued from Ingess Nginx Controller of version 1.10 and higher. It’s recommend to upgrade your configuration to use GeoIPv2 module. Use the following command to get the list of the IngressNginxControllers that contain GeoIPv1 variables: kubectl get ingressnginxcontrollers.deckhouse.io -o json | jq '.items[] | select(..|strings | test("\\$geoip_(country_(code3|code|name)|area_code|city_continent_code|city_country_(code3|code|name)|dma_code|latitude|longitude|region|region_name|city|postal_code|org)([^_a-zA-Z0-9]|$)+")) | .metadata.name'

Use the following command to get the list of the Ingress objects that contain GeoIPv1 variables: kubectl get ingress -A -o json | jq '.items[] | select(..|strings | test("\\$geoip_(country_(code3|code|name)|area_code|city_continent_code|city_country_(code3|code|name)|dma_code|latitude|longitude|region|region_name|city|postal_code|org)([^_a-zA-Z0-9]|$)+")) | "\(.metadata.namespace)/\(.metadata.name)"' | sort | uniq
NginxIngressConfigTestFailed CE S4
Config test failed on NGINX Ingress {{ $labels.controller }} in the {{ $labels.controller_namespace }} Namespace.
The configuration testing (nginx -t) of the {{ $labels.controller }} Ingress controller in the {{ $labels.controller_namespace }} Namespace has failed.

The recommended course of action:
1. Check controllers logs: kubectl -n {{ $labels.controller_namespace }} logs {{ $labels.controller_pod }} -c controller;
2. Find the newest Ingress in the cluster: kubectl get ingress --all-namespaces --sort-by="metadata.creationTimestamp";
3. Probably, there is an error in configuration-snippet or server-snippet.
NginxIngressDaemonSetNotUpToDate CE S9
There are {{ .Value }} outdated Pods in the {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.daemonset }} Ingress Nginx DaemonSet for the last 20 minutes.
There are {{ .Value }} outdated Pods in the {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.daemonset }} Ingress Nginx DaemonSet for the last 20 minutes.

The recommended course of action:
1. Check the DaemonSet’s status: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} get ads {{ $labels.daemonset }}
2. Analyze the DaemonSet’s description: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} describe ads {{ $labels.daemonset }}
3. If the Number of Nodes Scheduled with Up-to-date Pods parameter does not match Current Number of Nodes Scheduled, check the pertinent Ingress Nginx Controller’s ‘nodeSelector’ and ‘toleration’ settings, and compare them to the relevant nodes’ ‘labels’ and ‘taints’ settings

NginxIngressDaemonSetReplicasUnavailable CE S4

Count of available replicas in NGINX Ingress DaemonSet {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.daemonset}} is at zero.

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

This command might help figuring out problematic nodes given you are aware where the DaemonSet should be scheduled in the first place (using label selector for pods might be of help, too):

kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pod -ojson | jq -r '.items[] | select(.metadata.ownerReferences[] | select(.name =="{{$labels.daemonset}}")) | select(.status.phase != "Running" or ([ .status.conditions[] | select(.type == "Ready" and .status == "False") ] | length ) == 1 ) | .spec.affinity.nodeAffinity.requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution.nodeSelectorTerms[].matchFields[].values[]'

NginxIngressDaemonSetReplicasUnavailable CE S6

Some replicas of NGINX Ingress DaemonSet {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.daemonset}} are unavailable.

Some replicas of NGINX Ingress DaemonSet {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.daemonset}} are unavailable. Currently at: {{ .Value }} unavailable replica(s)

query)}}{{if not (eq $index 0)}}, {{ end }}{{ $result.Labels.pod }}{{ end }}

This command might help figuring out problematic nodes given you are aware where the DaemonSet should be scheduled in the first place (using label selector for pods might be of help, too):

kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pod -ojson | jq -r '.items[] | select(.metadata.ownerReferences[] | select(.name =="{{$labels.daemonset}}")) | select(.status.phase != "Running" or ([ .status.conditions[] | select(.type == "Ready" and .status == "False") ] | length ) == 1 ) | .spec.affinity.nodeAffinity.requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution.nodeSelectorTerms[].matchFields[].values[]'

NginxIngressPodIsRestartingTooOften CE S4

Too many NGINX Ingress restarts have been detected.

The number of restarts in the last hour: {{ $value }}. Excessive NGINX Ingress restarts indicate that something is wrong. Normally, it should be up and running all the time.
NginxIngressProtobufExporterHasErrors CE S8

The Ingress Nginx sidecar container with protobuf_exporter has {{ $labels.type }} errors.

The Ingress Nginx sidecar container with protobuf_exporter has {{ $labels.type }} errors.

Please, check Ingress controller’s logs: kubectl -n d8-ingress-nginx logs $(kubectl -n d8-ingress-nginx get pods -l app=controller,name={{ $labels.controller }} -o wide | grep {{ $labels.node }} | awk '{print $1}') -c protobuf-exporter.
NginxIngressSslExpired CE S4

Certificate has expired.

SSL certificate for {{ $labels.host }} in {{ $labels.namespace }} has expired. You can verify the certificate with the kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} get secret {{ $labels.secret_name }} -o json | jq -r '.data."tls.crt" | @base64d' | openssl x509 -noout -alias -subject -issuer -dates command.

https://{{ $labels.host }} version of site doesn’t work!
NginxIngressSslWillExpire CE S5

Certificate expires soon.

SSL certificate for {{ $labels.host }} in {{ $labels.namespace }} will expire in less than 2 weeks. You can verify the certificate with the kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} get secret {{ $labels.secret_name }} -o json | jq -r '.data."tls.crt" | @base64d' | openssl x509 -noout -alias -subject -issuer -dates command.

Module istio

D8IstioActualDataPlaneVersionNotEqualDesired EE S8
There are Pods with istio data-plane version {{$labels.version}}, but desired version is {{$labels.desired_version}}
There are Pods in Namespace {{$labels.namespace}} with istio data-plane version {{$labels.version}}, but the desired one is {{$labels.desired_version}}. Impact — istio version is to change after Pod restarting. Cheat sheet:
### namespace-wide configuration # istio.io/rev=vXYZ — use specific revision # istio-injection=enabled — use global revision kubectl get ns {{$labels.namespace}} --show-labels ### pod-wide configuration kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pods -l istio.io/rev={{$labels.desired_revision}}
D8IstioActualVersionIsNotInstalled EE S4
control-plane version for Pod with already injected sidecar isn't installed
There are pods with injected sidecar with version {{$labels.version}} (revision {{$labels.revision}}) in namespace {{$labels.namespace}}, but the control-plane version isn’t installed. Consider installing it or change the Namespace or Pod configuration. Impact — Pods have lost their sync with k8s state. Getting orphaned pods:
kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} get pods -l 'service.istio.io/canonical-name' -o json | jq --arg revision {{ $labels.revision }} '.items[] | select(.metadata.annotations."sidecar.istio.io/status" // "{}" | fromjson | .revision == $revision) | .metadata.name'
D8IstioAdditionalControlplaneDoesntWork CE S4
Additional controlplane doesn't work.
Additional istio controlplane {{$labels.label_istio_io_rev}} doesn’ work. Impact — sidecar injection for Pods with {{$labels.label_istio_io_rev}} revision doesn’t work.
kubectl get pods -n d8-istio -l istio.io/rev={{$labels.label_istio_io_rev}}
D8IstioDataPlaneVersionMismatch EE S8
There are Pods with data-plane version different from control-plane one.
There are Pods in {{$labels.namespace}} namespace with istio data-plane version {{$labels.full_version}} which differ from control-plane one {{$labels.desired_full_version}}. Consider restarting affected Pods, use PromQL query to get the list:
max by (namespace, dataplane_pod) (d8_istio_dataplane_metadata{full_version="{{$labels.full_version}}"})
Also consider using the automatic istio data-plane update described in the documentation: https://deckhouse.io/products/kubernetes-platform/documentation/v1/modules/110-istio/examples.html#upgrading-istio
D8IstioDataPlaneWithoutIstioInjectionConfigured EE S4
There are Pods with istio sidecars, but without istio-injection configured
There are Pods in {{$labels.namespace}} Namespace with istio sidecars, but the istio-injection isn’t configured. Impact — Pods will lose their istio sidecars after re-creation. Getting affected Pods:
kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pods -o json | jq -r --arg revision {{$labels.revision}} '.items[] | select(.metadata.annotations."sidecar.istio.io/status" // "{}" | fromjson | .revision == $revision) | .metadata.name'
D8IstioDeprecatedIstioVersionInstalled CE

There is deprecated istio version installed

There is deprecated istio version {{$labels.version}} installed. Impact — version support will be removed in future deckhouse releases. The higher alert severity — the higher probability of support cancelling. Read documentation on upgrading Istio.
D8IstioDesiredVersionIsNotInstalled EE S6
Desired control-plane version isn't installed
There is desired istio control plane version {{$labels.desired_version}} (revision {{$labels.revision}}) configured for pods in namespace {{$labels.namespace}}, but the version isn’t installed. Consider installing it or change the Namespace or Pod configuration. Impact — Pods won’t be able to re-create in the {{$labels.namespace}} Namespace. Cheat sheet:
### namespace-wide configuration # istio.io/rev=vXYZ — use specific revision # istio-injection=enabled — use global revision kubectl get ns {{$labels.namespace}} --show-labels ### pod-wide configuration kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pods -l istio.io/rev={{$labels.revision}}

D8IstioFederationMetadataEndpointDoesntWork EE S6

Federation metadata endpoint failed

Metadata endpoint {{$labels.endpoint}} for IstioFederation {{$labels.federation_name}} has failed to fetch by d8 hook. Reproducing request to public endpoint:

curl {{$labels.endpoint}}

Reproducing request to private endpoints (run from deckhouse pod):

KEY="$(deckhouse-controller module values istio -o json | jq -r .internal.remoteAuthnKeypair.priv)"
LOCAL_CLUSTER_UUID="$(deckhouse-controller module values -g istio -o json | jq -r .global.discovery.clusterUUID)"
REMOTE_CLUSTER_UUID="$(kubectl get istiofederation {{$labels.federation_name}} -o json | jq -r .status.metadataCache.public.clusterUUID)"
TOKEN="$(deckhouse-controller helper gen-jwt --private-key-path <(echo "$KEY") --claim iss=d8-istio --claim sub=$LOCAL_CLUSTER_UUID --claim aud=$REMOTE_CLUSTER_UUID --claim scope=private-federation --ttl 1h)"
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" {{$labels.endpoint}}

D8IstioGlobalControlplaneDoesntWork CE S4
Global controlplane doesn't work.
Global istio controlplane {{$labels.label_istio_io_rev}} doesn’ work. Impact — sidecar injection for Pods with global revision doesn’t work, validating webhook for istio resources is absent.
kubectl get pods -n d8-istio -l istio.io/rev={{$labels.label_istio_io_rev}}

D8IstioMulticlusterMetadataEndpointDoesntWork EE S6

Multicluster metadata endpoint failed

Metadata endpoint {{$labels.endpoint}} for IstioMulticluster {{$labels.multicluster_name}} has failed to fetch by d8 hook. Reproducing request to public endpoint:

curl {{$labels.endpoint}}

Reproducing request to private endpoints (run from deckhouse pod):

KEY="$(deckhouse-controller module values istio -o json | jq -r .internal.remoteAuthnKeypair.priv)"
LOCAL_CLUSTER_UUID="$(deckhouse-controller module values -g istio -o json | jq -r .global.discovery.clusterUUID)"
REMOTE_CLUSTER_UUID="$(kubectl get istiomulticluster {{$labels.multicluster_name}} -o json | jq -r .status.metadataCache.public.clusterUUID)"
TOKEN="$(deckhouse-controller helper gen-jwt --private-key-path <(echo "$KEY") --claim iss=d8-istio --claim sub=$LOCAL_CLUSTER_UUID --claim aud=$REMOTE_CLUSTER_UUID --claim scope=private-multicluster --ttl 1h)"
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" {{$labels.endpoint}}

D8IstioMulticlusterRemoteAPIHostDoesntWork EE S6
Multicluster remote api host failed
Remote api host {{$labels.api_host}} for IstioMulticluster {{$labels.multicluster_name}} has failed healthcheck by d8 monitoring hook.

Reproducing (run from deckhouse pod):
TOKEN="$(deckhouse-controller module values istio -o json | jq -r --arg ah {{$labels.api_host}} '.internal.multiclusters[]| select(.apiHost == $ah)| .apiJWT ')" curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" https://{{$labels.api_host}}/version
D8IstioOperatorReconcileError CE S5

istio-operator is unable to reconcile istio control-plane setup.

There is some error in istio-operator reconcilation loop. Please check the logs out:

kubectl -n d8-istio logs -l app=operator,revision={{$labels.revision}}
D8IstioPodsWithoutIstioSidecar EE S4
There are Pods without istio sidecars, but with istio-injection configured
There is a Pod {{$labels.dataplane_pod}} in {{$labels.namespace}} Namespace without istio sidecars, but the istio-injection is configured. Getting affected Pods:
kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pods -l '!service.istio.io/canonical-name' -o json | jq -r '.items[] | select(.metadata.annotations."sidecar.istio.io/inject" != "false") | .metadata.name'
D8IstioVersionIsIncompatibleWithK8sVersion CE S3

The installed istio version is incompatible with the k8s version

The current istio version {{$labels.istio_version}} may not work properly with the current k8s version {{$labels.k8s_version}}, because it is unsupported officially. Please upgrade istio as soon as possible. Read documentation on upgrading Istio.
IstioIrrelevantExternalServiceFound CE S5

Found external service with irrelevant ports spec

There is service in the namespace: {{$labels.namespace}} with the name: {{$labels.name}} which has irrelevant ports spec. .spec.ports[] do not make any sense for services with a type ExternalName but istio renders for External Services with ports listener “0.0.0.0:port” which catch all the traffic to the port. It is a problem for services out of istio registry.

It is recommended to get rid of ports section (.spec.ports). It is safe.

Module kube-dns

KubernetesCoreDNSHasCriticalErrors CE S5

CoreDNS has critical errors.

CoreDNS pod {{$labels.pod}} has at least one critical error. To debug the problem, look into container logs: kubectl -n kube-system logs {{$labels.pod}}

Module l2-load-balancer

L2LoadBalancerModuleDeprecated EE S3

L2LoadBalancer module is deprecated

The L2LoadBalancer module is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Disable the module and use MetalLB module in L2 mode.
L2LoadBalancerOrphanServiceFound EE S4

Found orphan service with irrelevant L2LoadBalancer name

There is orphan service in the namespace: {{$labels.namespace}} with the name: {{$labels.name}} which has irrelevant L2LoadBalancer name.

It is recommended to check L2LoadBalancer name in annotations (network.deckhouse.io/l2-load-balancer-name).

Module log-shipper

D8LogShipperAgentNotScheduledInCluster CE S7

Pods of log-shipper-agent cannot be scheduled in the cluster.

A number of log-shipper-agents are not scheduled.

To check the state of the d8-log-shipper/log-shipper-agent DaemonSet:

kubectl -n d8-log-shipper get daemonsets --selector=app=log-shipper

To check the state of the d8-log-shipper/log-shipper-agent Pods:

kubectl -n d8-log-shipper get pods --selector=app=log-shipper-agent

The following command might help figuring out problematic nodes given you are aware where the DaemonSet should be scheduled in the first place:

kubectl -n d8-log-shipper get pod -ojson | jq -r '.items[] | select(.metadata.ownerReferences[] | select(.name =="log-shipper-agent")) | select(.status.phase != "Running" or ([ .status.conditions[] | select(.type == "Ready" and .status == "False") ] | length ) == 1 ) | .spec.affinity.nodeAffinity.requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution.nodeSelectorTerms[].matchFields[].values[]'

D8LogShipperClusterLogDestinationD8LokiAuthorizationRequired CE S9

Required authorization params for ClusterLogDestination.

Found ClusterLogDestination resource {{$labels.resource_name}} without authorization params. You should add authorization params to the ClusterLogDestination resource.
D8LogShipperCollectLogErrors CE S4

Pods of log-shipper-agent cannot collect logs to the {{ $labels.component_id }} on the {{ $labels.node }} node.

The {{ $labels.host }} log-shipper agent on the {{ $labels.node }} node failed to collect metrics for more than 10 minutes. The reason is {{ $labels.error_type }} errors occurred during the {{ $labels.stage }} stage while reading {{ $labels.component_type }}.

Consider checking logs of the pod or follow advanced debug instructions. kubectl -n d8-log-shipper logs {{ $labels.host }} -c vector
D8LogShipperDestinationErrors CE S4

Pods of log-shipper-agent cannot send logs to the {{ $labels.component_id }} on the {{ $labels.node }} node.

Logs do not reach their destination, the {{ $labels.host }} log-shipper agent on the {{ $labels.node }} node cannot send logs for more than 10 minutes. The reason is {{ $labels.error_type }} errors occurred during the {{ $labels.stage }} stage while sending logs to {{ $labels.component_type }}.

Consider checking logs of the pod or follow advanced debug instructions. kubectl -n d8-log-shipper logs {{ $labels.host }} -c vector
D8LogShipperLogsDroppedByRateLimit CE S4

Pods of log-shipper-agent drop logs to the {{ $labels.component_id }} on the {{ $labels.node }} node.

Rate limit rules are applied, log-shipper agent on the {{ $labels.node }} node is dropping logs for more than 10 minutes.

Consider checking logs of the pod or follow advanced debug instructions. kubectl -n d8-log-shipper get pods -o wide | grep {{ $labels.node }}

Module metallb

D8MetalLBBGPSessionDown SE S4
MetalLB BGP session down.
{{ $labels.job }} — MetalLB {{ $labels.container }} on {{ $labels.pod}} has BGP session {{ $labels.peer }} down. Details are in logs:
kubectl -n d8-metallb logs daemonset/speaker -c speaker
D8MetalLBConfigNotLoaded SE S4
MetalLB config not loaded.
{{ $labels.job }} — MetalLB {{ $labels.container }} on {{ $labels.pod}} has not loaded. To figure out the problem, check controller logs:
kubectl -n d8-metallb logs deploy/controller -c controller
D8MetalLBConfigStale SE S4
MetalLB running on a stale configuration, because the latest config failed to load.
{{ $labels.job }} — MetalLB {{ $labels.container }} on {{ $labels.pod}} has run on a stale configuration, because the latest config failed to load. To figure out the problem, check controller logs:
kubectl -n d8-metallb logs deploy/controller -c controller

Module monitoring-applications

D8OldPrometheusTargetFormat FE S6

Services with the prometheus-target label are used to collect metrics in the cluster.

Services with the prometheus-target label are used to collect metrics in the cluster.

Use the following command to filter them: kubectl get service --all-namespaces --show-labels | grep prometheus-target

Note that the label format has changed. You need to replace the prometheus-target label with prometheus.deckhouse.io/target.

Module monitoring-custom

CustomPodMonitorFoundInCluster CE S9

There are PodMonitors in Deckhouse namespace that were not created by Deckhouse.

There are PodMonitors in Deckhouse namespace that were not created by Deckhouse.

Use the following command for filtering: kubectl get podmonitors --all-namespaces -l heritage!=deckhouse.

They must be moved from Deckhouse namespace to user-spec namespace (was not labeled as heritage: deckhouse).

The detailed description of the metric collecting process is available in the documentation.
CustomServiceMonitorFoundInD8Namespace CE S9

There are ServiceMonitors in Deckhouse namespace that were not created by Deckhouse.

There are ServiceMonitors in Deckhouse namespace that were not created by Deckhouse.

Use the following command for filtering: kubectl get servicemonitors --all-namespaces -l heritage!=deckhouse.

They must be moved from Deckhouse namespace to user-spec namespace (was not labeled as heritage: deckhouse).

The detailed description of the metric collecting process is available in the documentation.
D8CustomPrometheusRuleFoundInCluster CE S9

There are PrometheusRules in the cluster that were not created by Deckhouse.

There are PrometheusRules in the cluster that were not created by Deckhouse.

Use the following command for filtering: kubectl get prometheusrules --all-namespaces -l heritage!=deckhouse.

They must be abandoned and replaced with the CustomPrometheusRules object.

Please, refer to the documentation for information about adding alerts and/or recording rules.
D8OldPrometheusCustomTargetFormat CE S9

Services with the prometheus-custom-target label are used to collect metrics in the cluster.

Services with the prometheus-custom-target label are used to collect metrics in the cluster.

Use the following command for filtering: kubectl get service --all-namespaces --show-labels | grep prometheus-custom-target.

Note that the label format has changed. You need to change the prometheus-custom-target label to prometheus.deckhouse.io/custom-target.

For more information, refer to the documentation.
D8ReservedNodeLabelOrTaintFound CE S6
Node {{ $labels.name }} needs fixing up
Node {{ $labels.name }} uses:
- reserved metadata.labels node-role.deckhouse.io/ with ending not in (system|frontend|monitoring|_deckhouse_module_name_)
- or reserved spec.taints dedicated.deckhouse.io with values not in (system|frontend|monitoring|_deckhouse_module_name_)
Get instructions on how to fix it here.

Module monitoring-deckhouse

D8DeckhouseConfigInvalid CE S5

Deckhouse config is invalid.

Deckhouse config contains errors.

Please check Deckhouse logs by running kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.

Edit Deckhouse global configuration by running kubectl edit mc global or configuration of the specific module by running kubectl edit mc <MODULE_NAME>
D8DeckhouseCouldNotDeleteModule CE S4

Deckhouse is unable to delete the {{ $labels.module }} module.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.
D8DeckhouseCouldNotDiscoverModules CE S4

Deckhouse is unable to discover modules.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.
D8DeckhouseCouldNotRunGlobalHook CE S5

Deckhouse is unable to run the {{ $labels.hook }} global hook.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.
D8DeckhouseCouldNotRunModule CE S4

Deckhouse is unable to start the {{ $labels.module }} module.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.
D8DeckhouseCouldNotRunModuleHook CE S7

Deckhouse is unable to run the {{ $labels.module }}/{{ $labels.hook }} module hook.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.
D8DeckhouseCustomTargetDown CE S4
Prometheus is unable to scrape custom metrics generated by Deckhouse hooks.
D8DeckhouseDeprecatedConfigmapManagedByArgoCD CE S4

Deprecated deckhouse configmap managed by Argo CD

The deckhouse configmap is no longer used. You need to remove configmap “d8-system/deckhouse” from ArgoCD
D8DeckhouseGlobalHookFailsTooOften CE S9

The {{ $labels.hook }} Deckhouse global hook crashes way too often.

The {{ $labels.hook }} has failed in the last __SCRAPE_INTERVAL_X_4__.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.
D8DeckhouseHasNoAccessToRegistry CE S7

Deckhouse is unable to connect to the registry.

Deckhouse is unable to connect to the registry (registry.deckhouse.io in most cases) to check for a new Docker image (checks are performed every 15 seconds). Deckhouse does not have access to the registry; automatic updates are not available.

Usually, this alert means that the Deckhouse Pod is having difficulties with connecting to the Internet.
D8DeckhouseIsHung CE S4

Deckhouse is down.

Deckhouse is probably down since the deckhouse_live_ticks metric in Prometheus is no longer increasing (it is supposed to increment every 10 seconds).
D8DeckhouseIsNotOnReleaseChannel CE S9

Deckhouse in the cluster is not subscribed to one of the regular release channels.

Deckhouse is on a custom branch instead of one of the regular release channels.

It is recommended that Deckhouse be subscribed to one of the following channels: Alpha, Beta, EarlyAccess, Stable, RockSolid.

Use the command below to find out what release channel is currently in use: kubectl -n d8-system get deploy deckhouse -o json | jq '.spec.template.spec.containers[0].image' -r

Subscribe the cluster to one of the regular release channels.
D8DeckhouseModuleHookFailsTooOften CE S9

The {{ $labels.module }}/{{ $labels.hook }} Deckhouse hook crashes way too often.

The {{ $labels.hook }} hook of the {{ $labels.module }} module has failed in the last __SCRAPE_INTERVAL_X_4__.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.
D8DeckhouseModuleUpdatePolicyNotFound CE S5

Module update policy not found for {{ $labels.module_release }}

Module update policy not found for {{ $labels.module_release }}

You need to remove label from MR: kubectl label mr {{ $labels.module_release }} modules.deckhouse.io/update-policy-. A new suitable policy will be detected automatically.
D8DeckhousePodIsNotReady CE S4
The Deckhouse Pod is NOT Ready.
D8DeckhousePodIsNotRunning CE S4
The Deckhouse Pod is NOT Running.
D8DeckhousePodIsRestartingTooOften CE S9

Excessive Deckhouse restarts detected.

The number of restarts in the last hour: {{ $value }}.

Excessive Deckhouse restarts indicate that something is wrong. Normally, Deckhouse should be up and running all the time.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.
D8DeckhouseQueueIsHung CE S7

The {{ $labels.queue }} Deckhouse queue has hung; there are {{ $value }} task(s) in the queue.

Deckhouse cannot finish processing of the {{ $labels.queue }} queue with {{ $value }} tasks piled up.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -f -l app=deckhouse.
D8DeckhouseSelfTargetAbsent CE S4
There is no Deckhouse target in Prometheus.
D8DeckhouseSelfTargetDown CE S4
Prometheus is unable to scrape Deckhouse metrics.
D8DeckhouseWatchErrorOccurred CE S5

Possible apiserver connection error in the client-go informer, check logs and snapshots.

Error occurred in the client-go informer, possible problems with connection to apiserver.

Check Deckhouse logs for more information by running: kubectl -n d8-system logs deploy/deckhouse | grep error | grep -i watch

This alert is an attempt to detect the correlation between the faulty snapshot invalidation and apiserver connection errors, especially for the handle-node-template hook in the node-manager module. Check the difference between the snapshot and actual node objects for this hook: diff -u <(kubectl get nodes -o jsonpath='{range .items[*]}{.metadata.name}{"\n"}{end}'|sort) <(kubectl -n d8-system exec svc/deckhouse-leader -c deckhouse -- deckhouse-controller module snapshots node-manager -o json | jq '."040-node-manager/hooks/handle_node_templates.go"' | jq '.nodes.snapshot[] | .filterResult.Name' -r | sort)
D8HasModuleConfigAllowedToDisable CE S4

ModuleConfig annotation for allow to disable is setted.

ModuleConfig is waiting for disable.

It is recommended to keep clean your module configurations from approve annotations.

If you ignore this alert and do not clear the annotation, it may cause the module to be accidentally removed from the cluster.

Removing a module from a cluster can lead to a number of irreparable consequences.

Please run kubectl annotate moduleconfig {{ $labels.module }} modules.deckhouse.io/allow-disable- to stop this alert.
D8NodeHasDeprecatedOSVersion CE S4

Nodes have deprecated OS versions.

Some nodes have deprecated OS versions. Please update nodes to actual OS version.

To observe affected nodes use the expr kube_node_info{os_image=~"Ubuntu 18.04.*|Debian GNU/Linux 10.*|CentOS Linux 7.*"} in Prometheus.
D8NodeHasUnmetKernelRequirements CE S4

Nodes have unmet kernel requirements

Some nodes have unmet kernel constraints. This means that some modules cannot be run on that nodes. Current kernel constraint requirements: For Cilium module kernel should be >= 4.9.17. For Cilium with Istio modules kernel should be >= 5.7. For Cilium with OpenVPN modules kernel should be >= 5.7. For Cilium with Node-local-dns modules kernel should be >= 5.7.

To observe affected nodes use the expr d8_node_kernel_does_not_satisfy_requirements == 1 in Prometheus.
DeckhouseReleaseDisruptionApprovalRequired CE S4

Deckhouse release disruption approval required.

Deckhouse release contains disruption update.

You can figure out more details by running kubectl describe DeckhouseRelease {{ $labels.name }}. If you are ready to deploy this release, run: kubectl annotate DeckhouseRelease {{ $labels.name }} release.deckhouse.io/disruption-approved=true.
DeckhouseReleaseIsBlocked CE S5

Deckhouse release requirements unmet.

Deckhouse release requirements is not met.

Please run kubectl describe DeckhouseRelease {{ $labels.name }} for details.
DeckhouseReleaseIsWaitingManualApproval CE S3

Deckhouse release is waiting for manual approval.

Deckhouse release is waiting for manual approval.

Please run kubectl patch DeckhouseRelease {{ $labels.name }} --type=merge -p='{"approved": true}' for confirmation.
DeckhouseReleaseIsWaitingManualApproval CE S6

Deckhouse release is waiting for manual approval.

Deckhouse release is waiting for manual approval.

Please run kubectl patch DeckhouseRelease {{ $labels.name }} --type=merge -p='{"approved": true}' for confirmation.
DeckhouseReleaseIsWaitingManualApproval CE S9

Deckhouse release is waiting for manual approval.

Deckhouse release is waiting for manual approval.

Please run kubectl patch DeckhouseRelease {{ $labels.name }} --type=merge -p='{"approved": true}' for confirmation.
DeckhouseUpdating CE S4
Deckhouse is being updated.
DeckhouseUpdatingFailed CE S4

Deckhouse updating is failed.

Failed to update Deckhouse.

Next version minor/path Deckhouse image is not available in the registry or the image is corrupted. Actual version: {{ $labels.version }}.

Make sure that the next version Deckhouse image is available in the registry.
MigrationRequiredFromRBDInTreeProvisionerToCSIDriver CE S9

Storage class {{ $labels.storageclass }} uses the deprecated rbd provisioner. It is necessary to migrate the volumes to the Ceph CSI driver.

To migrate volumes use this script https://github.com/deckhouse/deckhouse/blob//modules/031-ceph-csi/tools/rbd-in-tree-to-ceph-csi-migration-helper.sh A description of how the migration is performed can be found here https://github.com/deckhouse/deckhouse/blob//modules/031-ceph-csi/docs/internal/INTREE_MIGRATION.md
ModuleReleaseIsWaitingManualApproval CE S6

Module release is waiting for manual approval.

Module release is waiting for manual approval.

Please run kubectl annotate mr {{ $labels.name }} modules.deckhouse.io/approved="true" for confirmation.

Module monitoring-kubernetes

CPUStealHigh CE S4

CPU Steal on the {{ $labels.node }} Node is too high.

The CPU steal is too high on the {{ $labels.node }} Node in the last 30 minutes.

Probably, some other component is stealing Node resources (e.g., a neighboring virtual machine). This may be the result of “overselling” the hypervisor. In other words, there are more virtual machines than the hypervisor can handle.
DeadMansSwitch CE S4

Alerting DeadMansSwitch

This is a DeadMansSwitch meant to ensure that the entire Alerting pipeline is functional.
DeploymentGenerationMismatch CE S4

Deployment is outdated

Observed deployment generation does not match expected one for deployment {{$labels.namespace}}/{{$labels.deployment}}
EbpfExporterKernelNotSupported CE S8
The BTF module required for ebpf_exporter is missing in the kernel. Possible actions to resolve the problem: * Built kernel with BTF type information info. * Disable ebpf_exporter
FdExhaustionClose CE S3

file descriptors soon exhausted

{{ $labels.job }}: {{ $labels.instance }} instance will exhaust in file/socket descriptors within the next hour
FdExhaustionClose CE S3

file descriptors soon exhausted

{{ $labels.job }}: {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.pod }} instance will exhaust in file/socket descriptors within the next hour
FdExhaustionClose CE S4

file descriptors soon exhausted

{{ $labels.job }}: {{ $labels.instance }} instance will exhaust in file/socket descriptors within the next 4 hours
FdExhaustionClose CE S4

file descriptors soon exhausted

{{ $labels.job }}: {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.pod }} instance will exhaust in file/socket descriptors within the next 4 hours

HelmReleasesHasResourcesWithDeprecatedVersions CE S5

At least one HELM release contains resources with deprecated apiVersion, which will be removed in Kubernetes v{{ $labels.k8s_version }}.

To observe all resources use the expr max by (helm_release_namespace, helm_release_name, helm_version, resource_namespace, resource_name, api_version, kind, k8s_version) (resource_versions_compatibility) == 1 in Prometheus.

You can find more details for migration in the deprecation guide: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide/#v{{ $labels.k8s_version

reReplaceAll “\.” “-“ }}.

Attention: The check runs once per hour, so this alert should go out within an hour after deprecated resources migration.

HelmReleasesHasResourcesWithUnsupportedVersions CE S4

At least one HELM release contains resources with unsupported apiVersion for Kubernetes v{{ $labels.k8s_version }}.

You can find more details for migration in the deprecation guide: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-guide/#v{{ $labels.k8s_version

reReplaceAll “\.” “-“ }}.

Attention: The check runs once per hour, so this alert should go out within an hour after deprecated resources migration.

K8SKubeletDown CE S3

Many kubelets cannot be scraped

Prometheus failed to scrape {{ $value }}% of kubelets.
K8SKubeletDown CE S4

A few kubelets cannot be scraped

Prometheus failed to scrape {{ $value }}% of kubelets.

K8SKubeletTooManyPods CE S7

Kubelet is close to pod limit

Kubelet {{ $labels.node }} is running {{ $value }} pods, close to the limit of {{ printf “kube_node_status_capacity{job="kube-state-metrics",resource="pods",unit="integer",node="%s"}” $labels.node

query

first

value }}

K8SManyNodesNotReady CE S3

Too many nodes are not ready

{{ $value }}% of Kubernetes nodes are not ready
K8SNodeNotReady CE S3

Node status is NotReady

The Kubelet on {{ $labels.node }} has not checked in with the API, or has set itself to NotReady, for more than 10 minutes
KubeletImageFSBytesUsage CE S5

No more free bytes on imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.

No more free bytes on imagefs (filesystem that the container runtime uses for storing images and container writable layers) on node {{$labels.node}} mountpoint {{$labels.mountpoint}}.
KubeletImageFSBytesUsage CE S6

Hard eviction of imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Hard eviction of imagefs (filesystem that the container runtime uses for storing images and container writable layers) on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_imagefs_bytes{type="hard", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletImageFSBytesUsage CE S7

Close to hard eviction threshold of imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.

Close to hard eviction threshold of imagefs (filesystem that the container runtime uses for storing images and container writable layers) on node {{$labels.node}} mountpoint {{$labels.mountpoint}}.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_imagefs_bytes{type="hard", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletImageFSBytesUsage CE S9

Soft eviction of imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Soft eviction of imagefs (filesystem that the container runtime uses for storing images and container writable layers) on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_imagefs_bytes{type="soft", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletImageFSInodesUsage CE S5
No more free inodes on imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.
KubeletImageFSInodesUsage CE S6

Hard eviction of imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Hard eviction of imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_imagefs_inodes{type="hard", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletImageFSInodesUsage CE S7

Close to hard eviction threshold of imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.

Close to hard eviction threshold of imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_imagefs_inodes{type="hard", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletImageFSInodesUsage CE S9

Soft eviction of imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Soft eviction of imagefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_imagefs_inodes{type="soft", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletNodeFSBytesUsage CE S5
No more free space on nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.
KubeletNodeFSBytesUsage CE S6

Hard eviction of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Hard eviction of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_nodefs_bytes{type="hard", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletNodeFSBytesUsage CE S7

Close to hard eviction threshold of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.

Close to hard eviction threshold of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_nodefs_bytes{type="hard", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletNodeFSBytesUsage CE S9

Soft eviction of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Soft eviction of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_nodefs_bytes{type="soft", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletNodeFSInodesUsage CE S5
No more free inodes on nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.
KubeletNodeFSInodesUsage CE S6

Hard eviction of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Hard eviction of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_nodefs_inodes{type="hard", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletNodeFSInodesUsage CE S7

Close to hard eviction threshold of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.

Close to hard eviction threshold of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_nodefs_inodes{type="hard", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubeletNodeFSInodesUsage CE S9

Soft eviction of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Soft eviction of nodefs on the {{$labels.node}} Node at the {{$labels.mountpoint}} mountpoint is in progress.

Threshold at: {{ printf “kubelet_eviction_nodefs_inodes{type="soft", node="%s", mountpoint="%s"}” $labels.node $labels.mountpoint query first value }}%

Currently at: {{ .Value }}%
KubernetesDnsTargetDown CE S5
Kube-dns or CoreDNS are not under monitoring.
Prometheus is unable to collect metrics from kube-dns. Thus its status is unknown.

To debug the problem, use the following commands:
1. kubectl -n kube-system describe deployment -l k8s-app=kube-dns
2. kubectl -n kube-system describe pod -l k8s-app=kube-dns
KubeStateMetricsDown CE S3
Kube-state-metrics is not working in the cluster.
There are no metrics about cluster resources for 5 minutes.

Most alerts an monitroing panels aren’t working.

To debug the problem:
1. Check kube-state-metrics pods: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app=kube-state-metrics
2. Check its logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe deploy kube-state-metrics
LoadBalancerServiceWithoutExternalIP CE S4

A load balancer has not been created.

One or more services with the LoadBalancer type cannot get an external address.

The list of services can be obtained with the following command: kubectl get svc -Ao json | jq -r ‘.items[] | select(.spec.type == “LoadBalancer”) | select(.status.loadBalancer.ingress[0].ip == null) | “namespace: (.metadata.namespace), name: (.metadata.name), ip: (.status.loadBalancer.ingress[0].ip)”’ Check the cloud-controller-manager logs in the ‘d8-cloud-provider-*’ namespace If you are using a bare-metal cluster with the metallb module enabled, check that the address space of the pool has not been exhausted.
NodeConntrackTableFull CE S3

The conntrack table is full.

The conntrack table on the {{ $labels.node }} Node is full!

No new connections are created or accepted on the Node; note that this may result in strange software issues.

The recommended course of action is to identify the source of “excess” conntrack entries using Okmeter or Grafana charts.
NodeConntrackTableFull CE S4

The conntrack table is close to the maximum size.

The conntrack table on the {{ $labels.node }} is {{ $value }}% of the maximum size.

There’s nothing to worry about yet if the conntrack table is only 70-80 percent full. However, if it runs out, you will experience problems with new connections while the software will behave strangely.

The recommended course of action is to identify the source of “excess” conntrack entries using Okmeter or Grafana charts.
NodeExporterDown CE S3

Prometheus could not scrape a node-exporter

Prometheus could not scrape a node-exporter for more than 10m, or node-exporters have disappeared from discovery
NodeFilesystemIsRO CE S4

The file system of the node is in read-only mode.

The file system on the node has switched to read-only mode.

See the node logs to find out the cause and fix it.
NodeSUnreclaimBytesUsageHigh CE S4
The {{ $labels.node }} Node has high kernel memory usage.
The {{ $labels.node }} Node has potential kernel memory leak. There is one known issue that can be reason for it.

You should check cgroupDriver on the {{ $labels.node }} Node:
- cat /var/lib/kubelet/config.yaml | grep 'cgroupDriver: systemd'
If cgroupDriver is set to systemd then reboot is required to roll back to cgroupfs driver. Please, drain and reboot the node.

You can check this issue for extra information.
NodeSystemExporterDoesNotExistsForNode CE S4
Some of the Node system exporters don’t work correctly for the {{ $labels.node }} Node.

The recommended course of action:
1. Find the Node exporter Pod for this Node: kubectl -n d8-monitoring get pod -l app=node-exporter -o json | jq -r ".items[] | select(.spec.nodeName==\"{{$labels.node}}\") | .metadata.name";
2. Describe the Node exporter Pod: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod <pod_name>;
3. Check that kubelet is running on the {{ $labels.node }} node.
NodeUnschedulable CE S8
The {{ $labels.node }} Node is cordon-protected; no new Pods can be scheduled onto it.
The {{ $labels.node }} Node is cordon-protected; no new Pods can be scheduled onto it.

This means that someone has executed one of the following commands on that Node:
- kubectl cordon {{ $labels.node }}
- kubectl drain {{ $labels.node }} that runs for more than 20 minutes
Probably, this is due to the maintenance of this Node.
PodStatusIsIncorrect CE
The state of the {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.pod }} Pod running on the {{ $labels.node }} Node is incorrect. You need to restart kubelet.
There is a {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.pod }} Pod in the cluster that runs on the {{ $labels.node }} and listed as NotReady while all the Pod’s containers are Ready.

This could be due to the Kubernetes bug.

The recommended course of action:
1. Find all the Pods having this state: kubectl get pod -o json --all-namespaces | jq '.items[] | select(.status.phase == "Running") | select(.status.conditions[] | select(.type == "ContainersReady" and .status == "True")) | select(.status.conditions[] | select(.type == "Ready" and .status == "False")) | "\(.spec.nodeName)/\(.metadata.namespace)/\(.metadata.name)"';
2. Find all the Nodes affected: kubectl get pod -o json --all-namespaces | jq '.items[] | select(.status.phase == "Running") | select(.status.conditions[] | select(.type == "ContainersReady" and .status == "True")) | select(.status.conditions[] | select(.type == "Ready" and .status == "False")) | .spec.nodeName' -r | sort | uniq -c;
3. Restart kubelet on each Node: systemctl restart kubelet.
StorageClassCloudManual CE S6

Manually deployed StorageClass {{ $labels.name }} found in the cluster

StorageClass having a cloud-provider provisioner shouldn’t be deployed manually. They are managed by the cloud-provider module, you only need to change the module configuration to fit your needs.
StorageClassDefaultDuplicate CE S6

Multiple default StorageClasses found in the cluster

More than one StorageClass in the cluster annotated as a default. Probably manually deployed StorageClass exists, that overlaps with cloud-provider module default Storage configuration.
UnsupportedContainerRuntimeVersion CE
Unsupported version of CRI {{$labels.container_runtime_version}} installed for Kubernetes version: {{$labels.kubelet_version}}
Unsupported version {{$labels.container_runtime_version}} of CRI installed on {{$labels.node}} node. Supported version of CRI for kubernetes {{$labels.kubelet_version}} version:
- Containerd 1.4.*
- Containerd 1.5.*
- Containerd 1.6.*
- Containerd 1.7.*

Module monitoring-kubernetes-control-plane

K8SApiserverDown CE S3

No API servers are reachable

No API servers are reachable or all have disappeared from service discovery
K8sCertificateExpiration CE S5
Kubernetes has API clients with soon expiring certificates
Some clients connect to {{$labels.component}} with certificate which expiring soon (less than 1 day) on node {{$labels.component}}.

You need to use kubeadm to check control plane certificates.
1. Install kubeadm: apt install kubeadm=1.24.*.
2. Check certificates: kubeadm alpha certs check-expiration
To check kubelet certificates, on each node you need to:
1. Check kubelet config:
  ps aux \ | grep "/usr/bin/kubelet" \ | grep -o -e "--kubeconfig=\S*" \ | cut -f2 -d"=" \ | xargs cat
2. Find field client-certificate or client-certificate-data
3. Check certificate using openssl
There are no tools to help you find other stale kubeconfigs. It will be better for you to enable control-plane-manager module to be able to debug in this case.
K8sCertificateExpiration CE S6
Kubernetes has API clients with soon expiring certificates
Some clients connect to {{$labels.component}} with certificate which expiring soon (less than 7 days) on node {{$labels.node}}.

You need to use kubeadm to check control plane certificates.
1. Install kubeadm: apt install kubeadm=1.24.*.
2. Check certificates: kubeadm alpha certs check-expiration
To check kubelet certificates, on each node you need to:
1. Check kubelet config:
  ps aux \ | grep "/usr/bin/kubelet" \ | grep -o -e "--kubeconfig=\S*" \ | cut -f2 -d"=" \ | xargs cat
2. Find field client-certificate or client-certificate-data
3. Check certificate using openssl
There are no tools to help you find other stale kubeconfigs. It will be better for you to enable control-plane-manager module to be able to debug in this case.
K8SControllerManagerTargetDown CE S3

Controller manager is down

There is no running kube-controller-manager. Deployments and replication controllers are not making progress.
K8SSchedulerTargetDown CE S3

Scheduler is down

There is no running K8S scheduler. New pods are not being assigned to nodes.
KubeEtcdHighFsyncDurations CE S7
Synching (fsync) WAL files to disk is slow.
In the last 15 minutes, the 99th percentile of the fsync duration for WAL files is longer than 0.5 seconds: {{ $value }}.

Possible causes:
1. High latency of the disk where the etcd data is located;
2. High CPU usage on the Node.
KubeEtcdHighNumberOfLeaderChanges CE S5
The etcd cluster re-elects the leader too often.
There were {{ $value }} leader re-elections for the etcd cluster member running on the {{ $labels.node }} Node in the last 10 minutes.

Possible causes:
1. High latency of the disk where the etcd data is located;
2. High CPU usage on the Node;
3. Degradation of network connectivity between cluster members in the multi-master mode.
KubeEtcdInsufficientMembers CE S4

There are insufficient members in the etcd cluster; the cluster will fail if one of the remaining members will become unavailable.

Check the status of the etcd pods: kubectl -n kube-system get pod -l component=etcd.
KubeEtcdNoLeader CE S4

The etcd cluster member running on the {{ $labels.node }} Node has lost the leader.

Check the status of the etcd Pods: kubectl -n kube-system get pod -l component=etcd | grep {{ $labels.node }}.
KubeEtcdTargetAbsent CE S5

There is no etcd target in Prometheus.

Check the status of the etcd Pods: kubectl -n kube-system get pod -l component=etcd or Prometheus logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app.kubernetes.io/name=prometheus -c prometheus
KubeEtcdTargetDown CE S5

Prometheus is unable to scrape etcd metrics.

Check the status of the etcd Pods: kubectl -n kube-system get pod -l component=etcd or Prometheus logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -l app.kubernetes.io/name=prometheus -c prometheus.

Module monitoring-ping

NodePingPacketLoss CE S4

Ping loss more than 5%

ICMP packet loss to node {{$labels.destination_node}} is more than 5%

Module node-manager

CapsInstanceUnavailable CE S8

There are unavailable instances in the {{ $labels.machine_deployment_name }} MachineDeployment.

In MachineDeployment {{ $labels.machine_deployment_name }} number of unavailable instances is {{ $value }}. Take a look and check at the state of the instances in the cluster: kubectl get instance -l node.deckhouse.io/group={{ $labels.machine_deployment_name }}
ClusterHasOrphanedDisks CE S6

Cloud data discoverer finds disks in the cloud for which there is no PersistentVolume in the cluster

Cloud data discoverer finds disks in the cloud for which there is no PersistentVolume in the cluster. You can manually delete these disks from your cloud: ID: {{ $labels.id }}, Name: {{ $labels.name }}
D8BashibleApiserverLocked CE S6

Bashible-apiserver is locked for too long

Check bashible-apiserver pods are up-to-date and running kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get pods -l app=bashible-apiserver
D8CloudDataDiscovererCloudRequestError CE S6

Cloud data discoverer cannot get data from cloud

Cloud data discoverer cannot get data from cloud. See cloud data discoverer logs for more information: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} logs deploy/cloud-data-discoverer
D8CloudDataDiscovererSaveError CE S6

Cloud data discoverer cannot save data to k8s resource

Cloud data discoverer cannot save data to k8s resource. See cloud data discoverer logs for more information: kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} logs deploy/cloud-data-discoverer
D8ClusterAutoscalerManagerPodIsNotReady CE S8
The {{$labels.pod}} Pod is NOT Ready.
D8ClusterAutoscalerPodIsNotRunning CE S8

The cluster-autoscaler Pod is NOT Running.

The {{$labels.pod}} Pod is {{$labels.phase}}.

Run the following command to check its status: kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pods {{$labels.pod}} -o json | jq .status.
D8ClusterAutoscalerPodIsRestartingTooOften CE S9

Too many cluster-autoscaler restarts have been detected.

The number of restarts in the last hour: {{ $value }}.

Excessive cluster-autoscaler restarts indicate that something is wrong. Normally, it should be up and running all the time.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager logs -f -l app=cluster-autoscaler -c cluster-autoscaler.
D8ClusterAutoscalerTargetAbsent CE S8
There is no cluster-autoscaler target in Prometheus.
Cluster-autoscaler automatically scales Nodes in the cluster; its unavailability will result in the inability to add new Nodes if there is a lack of resources to schedule Pods. In addition, the unavailability of cluster-autoscaler may result in over-spending due to provisioned but inactive cloud instances.

The recommended course of action:
1. Check the availability and status of cluster-autoscaler Pods: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get pods -l app=cluster-autoscaler
2. Check whether the cluster-autoscaler deployment is present: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get deploy cluster-autoscaler
3. Check the status of the cluster-autoscaler deployment: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager describe deploy cluster-autoscaler
D8ClusterAutoscalerTargetDown CE S8
Prometheus is unable to scrape cluster-autoscaler's metrics.
D8ClusterAutoscalerTooManyErrors CE S8

Cluster-autoscaler issues too many errors.

Cluster-autoscaler’s scaling attempt resulted in an error from the cloud provider.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager logs -f -l app=cluster-autoscaler -c cluster-autoscaler.
D8MachineControllerManagerPodIsNotReady CE S8
The {{$labels.pod}} Pod is NOT Ready.
D8MachineControllerManagerPodIsNotRunning CE S8

The machine-controller-manager Pod is NOT Running.

The {{$labels.pod}} Pod is {{$labels.phase}}.

Run the following command to check the status of the Pod: kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pods {{$labels.pod}} -o json | jq .status.
D8MachineControllerManagerPodIsRestartingTooOften CE S9

The machine-controller-manager module restarts too often.

The number of restarts in the last hour: {{ $value }}.

Excessive machine-controller-manager restarts indicate that something is wrong. Normally, it should be up and running all the time.

Please, refer to the logs: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager logs -f -l app=machine-controller-manager -c controller.
D8MachineControllerManagerTargetAbsent CE S8
There is no machine-controller-manager target in Prometheus.
Machine controller manager manages ephemeral Nodes in the cluster. Its unavailability will result in the inability to add/delete Nodes.

The recommended course of action:
1. Check the availability and status of machine-controller-manager Pods: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get pods -l app=machine-controller-manager;
2. Check the availability of the machine-controller-manager Deployment: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get deploy machine-controller-manager;
3. Check the status of the machine-controller-manager Deployment: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager describe deploy machine-controller-manager.
D8MachineControllerManagerTargetDown CE S8
Prometheus is unable to scrape machine-controller-manager's metrics.
D8NodeGroupIsNotUpdating CE S8

The {{ $labels.node_group }} node group is not handling the update correctly.

There is a new update for Nodes of the {{ $labels.node_group }} group; Nodes have learned about the update. However, no Node can get approval to start updating.

Most likely, there is a problem with the update_approval hook of the node-manager module.
D8NodeIsNotUpdating CE S7
The {{ $labels.node }} Node cannot complete the update.
There is a new update for the {{ $labels.node }} Node of the {{ $labels.node_group }} group; the Node has learned about the update, requested and received approval, started the update, ran into a step that causes possible downtime. The update manager (the update_approval hook of node-group module) performed the update, and the Node received downtime approval. However, there is no success message about the update.

Here is how you can view Bashible logs on the Node:
journalctl -fu bashible
D8NodeIsNotUpdating CE S8
The {{ $labels.node }} Node cannot complete the update.
There is a new update for the {{ $labels.node }} Node of the {{ $labels.node_group }} group}; the Node has learned about the update, requested and received approval, but cannot complete the update.

Here is how you can view Bashible logs on the Node:
journalctl -fu bashible
D8NodeIsNotUpdating CE S9
The {{ $labels.node }} Node does not update.
There is a new update for the {{ $labels.node }} Node of the {{ $labels.node_group }} group but it has not received the update nor trying to.

Most likely Bashible for some reason is not handling the update correctly. At this point, it must add the update.node.deckhouse.io/waiting-for-approval annotation to the Node so that it can be approved.

You can find out the most current version of the update using this command:
kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get secret configuration-checksums -o jsonpath={.data.{{ $labels.node_group }}} | base64 -d
Use the following command to find out the version on the Node:
kubectl get node {{ $labels.node }} -o jsonpath='{.metadata.annotations.node\.deckhouse\.io/configuration-checksum}'
Here is how you can view Bashible logs on the Node:
journalctl -fu bashible
D8NodeIsUnmanaged CE S9
The {{ $labels.node }} Node is not managed by the node-manager module.
The {{ $labels.node }} Node is not managed by the node-manager module.

The recommended actions are as follows:
- Follow these instructions to clean up the node and add it to the cluster: https://deckhouse.io/products/kubernetes-platform/documentation/v1/modules/040-node-manager/faq.html#how-to-clean-up-a-node-for-adding-to-the-cluster
D8NodeUpdateStuckWaitingForDisruptionApproval CE S8

The {{ $labels.node }} Node cannot get disruption approval.

There is a new update for the {{ $labels.node }} Node of the {{ $labels.node_group }} group; the Node has learned about the update, requested and received approval, started the update, and ran into a stage that causes possible downtime. For some reason, the Node cannot get that approval (it is issued fully automatically by the update_approval hook of the node-manager).
D8ProblematicNodeGroupConfiguration CE S8

The {{ $labels.node }} Node cannot begin the update.

There is a new update for Nodes of the {{ $labels.node_group }} group; Nodes have learned about the update. However, {{ $labels.node }} Node cannot be updated.

Node {{ $labels.node }} has no node.deckhouse.io/configuration-checksum annotation. Perhaps the bootstrap process of the Node did not complete correctly. Check the cloud-init logs (/var/log/cloud-init-output.log) of the Node. There is probably a problematic NodeGroupConfiguration resource for {{ $labels.node_group }} NodeGroup.
EarlyOOMPodIsNotReady CE S8
The {{$labels.pod}} Pod has detected unavailable PSI subsystem. Check logs for additional information: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager logs {{$labels.pod}} Possible actions to resolve the problem: * Upgrade kernel to version 4.20 or higher. * Enable Pressure Stall Information. * Disable early oom.
NodeGroupHasStaticInternalNetworkCIDRsField CE S9

NodeGroup {{ $labels.name }} has deprecated filed spec.static.internalNetworkCIDRs

Internal network CIDRs setting now located in the static cluster configuration. Delete this field from NodeGroup {{ $labels.name }} to fix this alert. Do not worry, it has been already migrated to another place.
NodeGroupMasterTaintIsAbsent CE S4
The 'master' node group does not contain desired taint.
master node group has no node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane taint. Probably control-plane nodes are misconfigured and are able to run not only control-plane Pods. Please, add:
nodeTemplate: taints: - effect: NoSchedule key: node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane
to the master node group spec. key: node-role.kubernetes.io/master taint was deprecated and will have no effect in Kubernetes 1.24+.
NodeGroupReplicasUnavailable CE S7
There are no available instances in the {{ $labels.node_group }} node group.
Probably, machine-controller-manager is unable to create a machine using the cloud provider module. Possible causes:
1. Cloud provider limits on available resources;
2. No access to the cloud provider API;
3. Cloud provider or instance class misconfiguration;
4. Problems with bootstrapping the Machine.
The recommended course of action:
1. Run kubectl get ng {{ $labels.node_group }} -o yaml. In the .status.lastMachineFailures field you can find all errors related to the creation of Machines;
2. The absence of Machines in the list that have been in Pending status for more than a couple of minutes means that Machines are continuously being created and deleted because of some error: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get machine;
3. Refer to the Machine description if the logs do not include error messages and the Machine continues to be Pending: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get machine <machine_name> -o json | jq .status.bootstrapStatus;
4. The output similar to the one below means that you have to use nc to examine the bootstrap logs:
  { "description": "Use 'nc 192.168.199.158 8000' to get bootstrap logs.", "tcpEndpoint": "192.168.199.158" }
5. The absence of information about the endpoint for getting logs means that cloudInit is not working correctly. This may be due to the incorrect configuration of the instance class for the cloud provider.
NodeGroupReplicasUnavailable CE S8
The number of simultaneously unavailable instances in the {{ $labels.node_group }} node group exceeds the allowed value.
Possibly, autoscaler has provisioned too many Nodes. Take a look at the state of the Machine in the cluster. Probably, machine-controller-manager is unable to create a machine using the cloud provider module. Possible causes:
1. Cloud provider limits on available resources;
2. No access to the cloud provider API;
3. Cloud provider or instance class misconfiguration;
4. Problems with bootstrapping the Machine.
The recommended course of action:
1. Run kubectl get ng {{ $labels.node_group }} -o yaml. In the .status.lastMachineFailures field you can find all errors related to the creation of Machines;
2. The absence of Machines in the list that have been in Pending status for more than a couple of minutes means that Machines are continuously being created and deleted because of some error: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get machine;
3. Refer to the Machine description if the logs do not include error messages and the Machine continues to be Pending: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get machine <machine_name> -o json | jq .status.bootstrapStatus;
4. The output similar to the one below means that you have to use nc to examine the bootstrap logs:
  { "description": "Use 'nc 192.168.199.158 8000' to get bootstrap logs.", "tcpEndpoint": "192.168.199.158" }
5. The absence of information about the endpoint for getting logs means that cloudInit is not working correctly. This may be due to the incorrect configuration of the instance class for the cloud provider.
NodeGroupReplicasUnavailable CE S8
There are unavailable instances in the {{ $labels.node_group }} node group.
The number of unavailable instances is {{ $value }}. See the relevant alerts for more information. Probably, machine-controller-manager is unable to create a machine using the cloud provider module. Possible causes:
1. Cloud provider limits on available resources;
2. No access to the cloud provider API;
3. Cloud provider or instance class misconfiguration;
4. Problems with bootstrapping the Machine.
The recommended course of action:
1. Run kubectl get ng {{ $labels.node_group }} -o yaml. In the .status.lastMachineFailures field you can find all errors related to the creation of Machines;
2. The absence of Machines in the list that have been in Pending status for more than a couple of minutes means that Machines are continuously being created and deleted because of some error: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get machine;
3. Refer to the Machine description if the logs do not include error messages and the Machine continues to be Pending: kubectl -n d8-cloud-instance-manager get machine <machine_name> -o json | jq .status.bootstrapStatus;
4. The output similar to the one below means that you have to use nc to examine the bootstrap logs:
  { "description": "Use 'nc 192.168.199.158 8000' to get bootstrap logs.", "tcpEndpoint": "192.168.199.158" }
5. The absence of information about the endpoint for getting logs means that cloudInit is not working correctly. This may be due to the incorrect configuration of the instance class for the cloud provider.
NodeRequiresDisruptionApprovalForUpdate CE S8
The {{ $labels.node }} Node requires disruption approval to proceed with the update
There is a new update for Nodes and the {{ $labels.node }} Node of the {{ $labels.node_group }} group has learned about the update, requested and received approval, started the update, and ran into a step that causes possible downtime.

You have to manually approve the disruption since the Manual mode is active in the group settings (disruptions.approvalMode).

Grant approval to the Node using the update.node.deckhouse.io/disruption-approved= annotation if it is ready for unsafe updates (e.g., drained).

Caution!!! The Node will not be drained automatically since the manual mode is enabled (disruptions.approvalMode: Manual).

Caution!!! No need to drain the master node.
- Use the following commands to drain the Node and grant it update approval:
  kubectl drain {{ $labels.node }} --delete-local-data=true --ignore-daemonsets=true --force=true && kubectl annotate node {{ $labels.node }} update.node.deckhouse.io/disruption-approved=
- Note that you need to uncordon the node after the update is complete (i.e., after removing the update.node.deckhouse.io/approved annotation).
  while kubectl get node {{ $labels.node }} -o json | jq -e '.metadata.annotations | has("update.node.deckhouse.io/approved")' > /dev/null; do sleep 1; done kubectl uncordon {{ $labels.node }}
Note that if there are several Nodes in a NodeGroup, you will need to repeat this operation for each Node since only one Node can be updated at a time. Perhaps it makes sense to temporarily enable the automatic disruption approval mode (disruptions.approvalMode: Automatic).
NodeStuckInDraining CE S6

The {{ $labels.node }} Node is stuck in draining.

The {{ $labels.node }} Node of the {{ $labels.node_group }} NodeGroup stuck in draining.

You can get more info by running: kubectl -n default get event --field-selector involvedObject.name={{ $labels.node }},reason=DrainFailed --sort-by='.metadata.creationTimestamp'

The error message is: {{ $labels.message }}
NodeStuckInDrainingForDisruptionDuringUpdate CE S6

The {{ $labels.node }} Node is stuck in draining.

There is a new update for the {{ $labels.node }} Node of the {{ $labels.node_group }} NodeGroup. The Node has learned about the update, requested and received approval, started the update, ran into a step that causes possible downtime, and stuck in draining in order to get disruption approval automatically.

You can get more info by running: kubectl -n default get event --field-selector involvedObject.name={{ $labels.node }},reason=ScaleDown --sort-by='.metadata.creationTimestamp'

Module okmeter

D8OkmeterAgentPodIsNotReady CE S6
Okmeter agent is not Ready

Module operator-prometheus

D8PrometheusOperatorPodIsNotReady CE S7
The prometheus-operator Pod is NOT Ready.
The new Prometheus, PrometheusRules, ServiceMonitor settings cannot be applied in the cluster; however, all existing and configured components continue to operate correctly. This problem will not affect alerting or monitoring in the short term (a few days).

The recommended course of action:
1. Analyze the Deployment info: kubectl -n d8-operator-prometheus describe deploy prometheus-operator;
2. Examine the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-operator-prometheus describe pod -l app=prometheus-operator.
D8PrometheusOperatorPodIsNotRunning CE S7
The prometheus-operator Pod is NOT Running.
The new Prometheus, PrometheusRules, ServiceMonitor settings cannot be applied in the cluster; however, all existing and configured components continue to operate correctly. This problem will not affect alerting or monitoring in the short term (a few days).

The recommended course of action:
1. Analyze the Deployment info: kubectl -n d8-operator-prometheus describe deploy prometheus-operator;
2. Examine the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-operator-prometheus describe pod -l app=prometheus-operator.
D8PrometheusOperatorTargetAbsent CE S7

There is no prometheus-operator target in Prometheus.

The new Prometheus, PrometheusRules, ServiceMonitor settings cannot be applied in the cluster; however, all existing and configured components continue to operate correctly. This problem will not affect alerting or monitoring in the short term (a few days).

The recommended course of action is to analyze the deployment information: kubectl -n d8-operator-prometheus describe deploy prometheus-operator.
D8PrometheusOperatorTargetDown CE S8
Prometheus is unable to scrape prometheus-operator metrics.
The prometheus-operator Pod is not available.

The new Prometheus, PrometheusRules, ServiceMonitor settings cannot be applied in the cluster; however, all existing and configured components continue to operate correctly. This problem will not affect alerting or monitoring in the short term (a few days).

The recommended course of action:
1. Analyze the Deployment info: kubectl -n d8-operator-prometheus describe deploy prometheus-operator;
2. Examine the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-operator-prometheus describe pod -l app=prometheus-operator.

Module prometheus

D8GrafanaDeploymentReplicasUnavailable CE S6

One or more Grafana Pods are NOT Running.

The number of Grafana replicas is less than the specified number.

The Deployment is in the MinimumReplicasUnavailable state.

Run the following command to check the status of the Deployment: kubectl -n d8-monitoring get deployment grafana -o json | jq .status.

Run the following command to check the status of the Pods: kubectl -n d8-monitoring get pods -l app=grafana -o json | jq '.items[] | {(.metadata.name):.status}'.
D8GrafanaDeprecatedCustomDashboardDefinition CE S9

The deprecated ConfigMap for defining Grafana dashboards is detected.

The grafana-dashboard-definitions-custom ConfigMap was found in the d8-monitoring namespace. This means that the deprecated method of registering custom dashboards in Grafana is being used.

This method is no longer used! Please, use the custom GrafanaDashboardDefinition resource instead.
D8GrafanaPodIsNotReady CE S6
The Grafana Pod is NOT Ready.
D8GrafanaPodIsRestartingTooOften CE S9

Excessive Grafana restarts are detected.

The number of restarts in the last hour: {{ $value }}.

Excessive Grafana restarts indicate that something is wrong. Normally, Grafana should be up and running all the time.

Please, refer to the corresponding logs: kubectl -n d8-monitoring logs -f -l app=grafana -c grafana.
D8GrafanaTargetAbsent CE S6
There is no Grafana target in Prometheus.
Grafana visualizes metrics collected by Prometheus. Grafana is critical for some tasks, such as monitoring the state of applications and the cluster as a whole. Additionally, Grafana unavailability can negatively impact users who actively use it in their work.

The recommended course of action:
1. Check the availability and status of Grafana Pods: kubectl -n d8-monitoring get pods -l app=grafana;
2. Check the availability of the Grafana Deployment: kubectl -n d8-monitoring get deployment grafana;
3. Examine the status of the Grafana Deployment: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe deployment grafana.
D8GrafanaTargetDown CE S6
Prometheus is unable to scrape Grafana metrics.
D8PrometheusLongtermFederationTargetDown CE S5

prometheus-longterm cannot scrape prometheus.

prometheus-longterm cannot scrape “/federate” endpoint from Prometheus. Check error cause in prometheus-longterm WebUI or logs.
D8PrometheusLongtermTargetAbsent CE S7
There is no prometheus-longterm target in Prometheus.
This Prometheus component is only used to display historical data and is not crucial. However, if its unavailability will last long enough, you will not be able to view the statistics.

Usually, Pods of this type have problems because of disk unavailability (e.g., the disk cannot be mounted to a Node for some reason).

The recommended course of action:
1. Take a look at the StatefulSet data: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe statefulset prometheus-longterm;
2. Explore its PVC (if used): kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pvc prometheus-longterm-db-prometheus-longterm-0;
3. Explore the Pod’s state: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod prometheus-longterm-0.
D8TricksterTargetAbsent CE S5
There is no Trickster target in Prometheus.
The following modules use this component:
- prometheus-metrics-adapter — the unavailability of the component means that HPA (auto scaling) is not running and you cannot view resource consumption using kubectl;
- vertical-pod-autoscaler — this module is quite capable of surviving a short-term unavailability, as VPA looks at the consumption history for 8 days;
- grafana — by default, all dashboards use Trickster for caching requests to Prometheus. You can retrieve data directly from Prometheus (bypassing the Trickster). However, this may lead to high memory usage by Prometheus and, hence, to its unavailability.
The recommended course of action:
1. Analyze the Deployment information: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe deployment trickster;
2. Analyze the Pod information: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app=trickster;
3. Usually, Trickster is unavailable due to Prometheus-related issues because the Trickster’s readinessProbe checks the Prometheus availability. Thus, make sure that Prometheus is running: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app.kubernetes.io/name=prometheus,prometheus=main.
D8TricksterTargetAbsent CE S5
There is no Trickster target in Prometheus.
The following modules use this component:
- prometheus-metrics-adapter — the unavailability of the component means that HPA (auto scaling) is not running and you cannot view resource consumption using kubectl;
- vertical-pod-autoscaler — this module is quite capable of surviving a short-term unavailability, as VPA looks at the consumption history for 8 days;
- grafana — by default, all dashboards use Trickster for caching requests to Prometheus. You can retrieve data directly from Prometheus (bypassing the Trickster). However, this may lead to high memory usage by Prometheus and, hence, to unavailability.
The recommended course of action:
1. Analyze the Deployment stats: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe deployment trickster;
2. Analyze the Pod stats: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app=trickster;
3. Usually, Trickster is unavailable due to Prometheus-related issues because the Trickster’s readinessProbe checks the Prometheus availability. Thus, make sure that Prometheus is running: kubectl -n d8-monitoring describe pod -l app.kubernetes.io/name=prometheus,prometheus=main.
DeckhouseModuleUseEmptyDir CE S9

Deckhouse module {{ $labels.module_name }} use emptydir as storage.

Deckhouse module {{ $labels.module_name }} use emptydir as storage.
GrafanaDashboardAlertRulesDeprecated CE S8

Deprecated Grafana alerts have been found.

Before updating to Grafana 10, it’s required to migrate an outdated alerts from Grafana to the external alertmanager (or exporter-alertmanager stack) To list all deprecated alert rules use the expr sum by (dashboard, panel, alert_rule) (d8_grafana_dashboards_deprecated_alert_rule) > 0

Attention: The check runs once per hour, so this alert should go out within an hour after deprecated resources migration.
GrafanaDashboardPanelIntervalDeprecated CE S8

Deprecated Grafana panel intervals have been found.

Before updating to Grafana 10, it’s required to rewrite an outdated expressions that uses $interval_rv, interval_sx3 or interval_sx4 to $__rate_interval To list all deprecated panel intervals use the expr sum by (dashboard, panel, interval) (d8_grafana_dashboards_deprecated_interval) > 0

Attention: The check runs once per hour, so this alert should go out within an hour after deprecated resources migration.
GrafanaDashboardPluginsDeprecated CE S8

Deprecated Grafana plugins have been found.

Before updating to Grafana 10, it’s required to check if currently installed plugins will work correctly with Grafana 10 To list all potentially outdated plugins use the expr sum by (dashboard, panel, plugin) (d8_grafana_dashboards_deprecated_plugin) > 0

Plugin “flant-statusmap-panel” is being deprecated and won’t be supported in the near future We recommend you to migrate to the State Timeline plugin: https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/panels-visualizations/visualizations/state-timeline/

Attention: The check runs once per hour, so this alert should go out within an hour after deprecated resources migration.
K8STooManyNodes CE S7

Nodes amount is close to the maximum allowed amount.

Cluster is running {{ $value }} nodes, close to the maximum amount of {{ print “d8_max_nodes_amount{}” query first value }} nodes.
PrometheusDiskUsage CE S4
Prometheus disk is over 95% used.
For more information, use the command:
kubectl -n {{ $labels.namespace }} exec -ti {{ $labels.pod_name }} -c prometheus -- df -PBG /prometheus
Consider increasing it https://deckhouse.io/products/kubernetes-platform/documentation/v1/modules/300-prometheus/faq.html#how-to-expand-disk-size
PrometheusLongtermRotatingEarlierThanConfiguredRetentionDays CE S4

Prometheus-longterm data is being rotated earlier than configured retention days

You need to increase the disk size, reduce the number of metrics or decrease longtermRetentionDays module parameter.
PrometheusMainRotatingEarlierThanConfiguredRetentionDays CE S4

Prometheus-main data is being rotated earlier than configured retention days

You need to increase the disk size, reduce the number of metrics or decrease retentionDays module parameter.
PrometheusScapeConfigDeclarationDeprecated CE S8

AdditionalScrapeConfigs from secrets will be deprecated in soon

Old way for describing additional scrape config via secrets will be deprecated in prometheus-operator > v0.65.1. Please use CRD ScrapeConfig instead. https://github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/blob/main/Documentation/proposals/202212-scrape-config.md

PrometheusServiceMonitorDeprecated CE S8

Deprecated Prometheus ServiceMonitor has found.

Kubernetes cluster uses a more advanced network mechanism - EndpointSlice You service monitor {{ $labels.namespace }}/{{ $labels.name }} has relabeling with old Endpoint mechanism, starts with __meta_kubernetes_endpoints_. This relabeling rule support, based on the _endpoint_ label, will be remove in the future (Deckhouse release 1.60). Please, migrate to EndpointSlice relabeling rules. To do this, you have modify ServiceMonitor with changing the following labels:

__meta_kubernetes_endpoints_name -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_name
__meta_kubernetes_endpoints_label_XXX -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_label_XXX
__meta_kubernetes_endpoints_labelpresent_XXX -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_labelpresent_XXX
__meta_kubernetes_endpoints_annotation_XXX -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_annotation_XXX
__meta_kubernetes_endpoints_annotationpresent_XXX -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_annotationpresent_XXX
__meta_kubernetes_endpoint_node_name -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_endpoint_topology_kubernetes_io_hostname
__meta_kubernetes_endpoint_ready -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_endpoint_conditions_ready
__meta_kubernetes_endpoint_port_name -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_port_name
__meta_kubernetes_endpoint_port_protocol -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_port_protocol
__meta_kubernetes_endpoint_address_target_kind -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_address_target_kind
__meta_kubernetes_endpoint_address_target_name -> __meta_kubernetes_endpointslice_address_target_name

TargetDown CE S5

Target is down

{{ $labels.job }} target is down.
TargetDown CE S6

Target is down

{{ $labels.job }} target is down.
TargetDown CE S7

Target is down

{{ $labels.job }} target is down.
TargetSampleLimitExceeded CE S6

Scrapes are exceeding sample limit

Target are down because of a sample limit exceeded.
TargetSampleLimitExceeded CE S7

The sampling limit is close.

The target is close to exceeding the sampling limit. less than 10% left to the limit

Module runtime-audit-engine

D8RuntimeAuditEngineNotScheduledInCluster EE S4
Pods of runtime-audit-engine cannot be scheduled in the cluster.
A number of runtime-audit-engine pods are not scheduled. Security audit is not fully operational.

Consider checking state of the d8-runtime-audit-engine/runtime-audit-engine DaemonSet. kubectl -n d8-runtime-audit-engine get daemonset,pod --selector=app=runtime-audit-engine Get a list of nodes that have pods in an not Ready state.
kubectl -n {{$labels.namespace}} get pod -ojson | jq -r '.items[] | select(.metadata.ownerReferences[] | select(.name =="{{$labels.daemonset}}")) | select(.status.phase != "Running" or ([ .status.conditions[] | select(.type == "Ready" and .status == "False") ] | length ) == 1 ) | .spec.affinity.nodeAffinity.requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution.nodeSelectorTerms[].matchFields[].values[]'

Module secret-copier

D8SecretCopierDeprecatedLabels CE S9

Obsolete antiopa_secret_copier=yes label has been found.

The secrets copier module has changed the service label for the original secrets in the default namespace.

Soon we will abandon the old antiopa-secret-copier: "yes" label.

You have to replace the antiopa-secret-copier: "yes" label with secret-copier.deckhouse.io/enabled: "" for all secrets that the secret-copier module uses in the default namespace.

Module snapshot-controller

D8SnapshotControllerPodIsNotReady CE S8
The snapshot-controller Pod is NOT Ready.
The recommended course of action:
1. Retrieve details of the Deployment: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller describe deploy snapshot-controller
2. View the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller describe pod -l app=snapshot-controller
D8SnapshotControllerPodIsNotRunning CE S8
The snapshot-controller Pod is NOT Running.
The recommended course of action:
1. Retrieve details of the Deployment: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller describe deploy snapshot-controller
2. View the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller describe pod -l app=snapshot-controller
D8SnapshotControllerTargetAbsent CE S8
There is no snapshot-controller target in Prometheus.
The recommended course of action:
1. Check the Pod status: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller get pod -l app=snapshot-controller
2. Or check the Pod logs: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller logs -l app=snapshot-controller -c snapshot-controller
D8SnapshotControllerTargetDown CE S8
Prometheus cannot scrape the snapshot-controller metrics.
The recommended course of action:
1. Check the Pod status: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller get pod -l app=snapshot-controller
2. Or check the Pod logs: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller logs -l app=snapshot-controller -c snapshot-controller
D8SnapshotValidationWebhookPodIsNotReady CE S8
The snapshot-validation-webhook Pod is NOT Ready.
The recommended course of action:
1. Retrieve details of the Deployment: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller describe deploy snapshot-validation-webhook
2. View the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller describe pod -l app=snapshot-validation-webhook
D8SnapshotValidationWebhookPodIsNotRunning CE S8
The snapshot-validation-webhook Pod is NOT Running.
The recommended course of action:
1. Retrieve details of the Deployment: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller describe deploy snapshot-validation-webhook
2. View the status of the Pod and try to figure out why it is not running: kubectl -n d8-snapshot-controller describe pod -l app=snapshot-validation-webhook

Module terraform-manager

D8TerraformStateExporterClusterStateChanged CE S8

Terraform-state-exporter cluster state changed

Real Kubernetes cluster state is {{ $labels.status }} comparing to Terraform state.

It’s important to make them equal. First, run the dhctl terraform check command to check what will change. To converge state of Kubernetes cluster, use dhctl converge command.
D8TerraformStateExporterClusterStateError CE S8

Terraform-state-exporter cluster state error

Terraform-state-exporter can’t check difference between Kubernetes cluster state and Terraform state.

Probably, it occurred because Terraform-state-exporter had failed to run terraform with current state and config. First, run the dhctl terraform check command to check what will change. To converge state of Kubernetes cluster, use dhctl converge command.
D8TerraformStateExporterHasErrors CE S8

Terraform-state-exporter has errors

Errors occurred while terraform-state-exporter working.

Check pods logs to get more details: kubectl -n d8-system logs -l app=terraform-state-exporter -c exporter
D8TerraformStateExporterNodeStateChanged CE S8

Terraform-state-exporter node state changed

Real Node {{ $labels.node_group }}/{{ $labels.name }} state is {{ $labels.status }} comparing to Terraform state.

It’s important to make them equal. First, run the dhctl terraform check command to check what will change. To converge state of Kubernetes cluster, use dhctl converge command.
D8TerraformStateExporterNodeStateError CE S8

Terraform-state-exporter node state error

Terraform-state-exporter can’t check difference between Node {{ $labels.node_group }}/{{ $labels.name }} state and Terraform state.

Probably, it occurred because Terraform-manager had failed to run terraform with current state and config. First, run the dhctl terraform check command to check what will change. To converge state of Kubernetes cluster, use dhctl converge command.
D8TerraformStateExporterNodeTemplateChanged CE S8

Terraform-state-exporter node template changed

Terraform-state-exporter found difference between node template from cluster provider configuration and from NodeGroup {{ $labels.name }}. Node template is {{ $labels.status }}.

First, run the dhctl terraform check command to check what will change. Use dhctl converge command or manually adjust NodeGroup settings to fix the issue.
D8TerraformStateExporterPodIsNotReady CE S8
Pod terraform-state-exporter is not Ready
Terraform-state-exporter doesn’t check the difference between real Kubernetes cluster state and Terraform state.

Pease, check:
1. Deployment description: kubectl -n d8-system describe deploy terraform-state-exporter
2. Pod status: kubectl -n d8-system describe pod -l app=terraform-state-exporter
D8TerraformStateExporterPodIsNotRunning CE S8
Pod terraform-state-exporter is not Running
Terraform-state-exporter doesn’t check the difference between real Kubernetes cluster state and Terraform state.

Pease, check:
1. Deployment description: kubectl -n d8-system describe deploy terraform-state-exporter
2. Pod status: kubectl -n d8-system describe pod -l app=terraform-state-exporter
D8TerraformStateExporterTargetAbsent CE S8

Prometheus has no terraform-state-exporter target

To get more details: Check pods state: kubectl -n d8-system get pod -l app=terraform-state-exporter or logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -l app=terraform-state-exporter -c exporter
D8TerraformStateExporterTargetDown CE S8

Prometheus can't scrape terraform-state-exporter

To get more details: Check pods state: kubectl -n d8-system get pod -l app=terraform-state-exporter or logs: kubectl -n d8-system logs -l app=terraform-state-exporter -c exporter

Module upmeter

D8SmokeMiniNotBoundPersistentVolumeClaims CE S9

Smoke-mini has unbound or lost persistent volume claims.

{{ $labels.persistentvolumeclaim }} persistent volume claim status is {{ $labels.phase }}.

There is a problem with pv provisioning. Check the status of the pvc o find the problem: kubectl -n d8-upmeter get pvc {{ $labels.persistentvolumeclaim }}

If you have no disk provisioning system in the cluster, you can disable ordering volumes for the some-mini through the module settings.
D8UpmeterAgentPodIsNotReady CE S6
Upmeter agent is not Ready
D8UpmeterAgentReplicasUnavailable CE S6

One or more Upmeter agent pods is NOT Running

Check DaemonSet status: kubectl -n d8-upmeter get daemonset upmeter-agent -o json | jq .status

Check the status of its pod: kubectl -n d8-upmeter get pods -l app=upmeter-agent -o json | jq '.items[] | {(.metadata.name):.status}'
D8UpmeterProbeGarbageConfigmap CE S9
Garbage produced by basic probe is not being cleaned.
Probe configmaps found.

Upmeter agents should clean ConfigMaps produced by control-plane/basic probe. There should not be more configmaps than master nodes (upmeter-agent is a DaemonSet with master nodeSelector). Also, they should be deleted within seconds.

This might be an indication of a problem with kube-apiserver. Or, possibly, the configmaps were left by old upmeter-agent pods due to Upmeter update.
1. Check upmeter-agent logs
kubectl -n d8-upmeter logs -l app=upmeter-agent --tail=-1 | jq -rR 'fromjson? | select(.group=="control-plane" and .probe == "basic-functionality") | [.time, .level, .msg] | @tsv'
1. Check that control plane is functional.
2. Delete configmaps manually:
kubectl -n d8-upmeter delete cm -l heritage=upmeter
D8UpmeterProbeGarbageDeployment CE S9
Garbage produced by controller-manager probe is not being cleaned.
Average probe deployments count per upmeter-agent pod: {{ $value }}.

Upmeter agents should clean Deployments produced by control-plane/controller-manager probe. There should not be more deployments than master nodes (upmeter-agent is a DaemonSet with master nodeSelector). Also, they should be deleted within seconds.

This might be an indication of a problem with kube-apiserver. Or, possibly, the deployments were left by old upmeter-agent pods due to Upmeter update.
1. Check upmeter-agent logs
kubectl -n d8-upmeter logs -l app=upmeter-agent --tail=-1 | jq -rR 'fromjson? | select(.group=="control-plane" and .probe == "controller-manager") | [.time, .level, .msg] | @tsv'
1. Check that control plane is functional, kube-controller-manager in particular.
2. Delete deployments manually:
kubectl -n d8-upmeter delete deploy -l heritage=upmeter
D8UpmeterProbeGarbageNamespaces CE S9
Garbage produced by namespace probe is not being cleaned.
Average probe namespace per upmeter-agent pod: {{ $value }}.

Upmeter agents should clean namespaces produced by control-plane/namespace probe. There should not be more of these namespaces than master nodes (upmeter-agent is a DaemonSet with master nodeSelector). Also, they should be deleted within seconds.

This might be an indication of a problem with kube-apiserver. Or, possibly, the namespaces were left by old upmeter-agent pods due to Upmeter update.
1. Check upmeter-agent logs
kubectl -n d8-upmeter logs -l app=upmeter-agent --tail=-1 | jq -rR 'fromjson? | select(.group=="control-plane" and .probe == "namespace") | [.time, .level, .msg] | @tsv'
1. Check that control plane is functional.
2. Delete namespaces manually: kubectl -n d8-upmeter delete ns -l heritage=upmeter
D8UpmeterProbeGarbagePods CE S9
Garbage produced by scheduler probe is not being cleaned.
Average probe pods count per upmeter-agent pod: {{ $value }}.

Upmeter agents should clean Pods produced by control-plane/scheduler probe. There should not be more of these pods than master nodes (upmeter-agent is a DaemonSet with master nodeSelector). Also, they should be deleted within seconds.

This might be an indication of a problem with kube-apiserver. Or, possibly, the pods were left by old upmeter-agent pods due to Upmeter update.
1. Check upmeter-agent logs
kubectl -n d8-upmeter logs -l app=upmeter-agent --tail=-1 | jq -rR 'fromjson? | select(.group=="control-plane" and .probe == "scheduler") | [.time, .level, .msg] | @tsv'
1. Check that control plane is functional.
2. Delete pods manually:
kubectl -n d8-upmeter delete po -l upmeter-probe=scheduler
D8UpmeterProbeGarbagePodsFromDeployments CE S9
Garbage produced by controller-manager probe is not being cleaned.
Average probe pods count per upmeter-agent pod: {{ $value }}.

Upmeter agents should clean Deployments produced by control-plane/controller-manager probe, and hence kube-controller-manager should clean their pods. There should not be more of these pods than master nodes (upmeter-agent is a DaemonSet with master nodeSelector). Also, they should be deleted within seconds.

This might be an indication of a problem with kube-apiserver or kube-controller-manager. Or, probably, the pods were left by old upmeter-agent pods due to Upmeter update.
1. Check upmeter-agent logs
kubectl -n d8-upmeter logs -l app=upmeter-agent --tail=-1 | jq -rR 'fromjson? | select(.group=="control-plane" and .probe == "controller-manager") | [.time, .level, .msg] | @tsv'
1. Check that control plane is functional, kube-controller-manager in particular.
2. Delete pods manually:
kubectl -n d8-upmeter delete po -l upmeter-probe=controller-manager
D8UpmeterProbeGarbageSecretsByCertManager CE S9
Garbage produced by cert-manager probe is not being cleaned.
Probe secrets found.

Upmeter agents should clean certificates, and thus secrets produced by cert-manager should clean, too. There should not be more secrets than master nodes (upmeter-agent is a DaemonSet with master nodeSelector). Also, they should be deleted within seconds.

This might be an indication of a problem with kube-apiserver, or cert-manager, or upmeter itself. It is also possible, that the secrets were left by old upmeter-agent pods due to Upmeter update.
1. Check upmeter-agent logs
kubectl -n d8-upmeter logs -l app=upmeter-agent --tail=-1 | jq -rR 'fromjson? | select(.group=="control-plane" and .probe == "cert-manager") | [.time, .level, .msg] | @tsv'
1. Check that control plane and cert-manager are functional.
2. Delete certificates manually, and secrets, if needed:
kubectl -n d8-upmeter delete certificate -l upmeter-probe=cert-manager kubectl -n d8-upmeter get secret -ojson | jq -r '.items[] | .metadata.name' | grep upmeter-cm-probe | xargs -n 1 -- kubectl -n d8-upmeter delete secret
D8UpmeterServerPodIsNotReady CE S6
Upmeter server is not Ready
D8UpmeterServerPodIsRestartingTooOften CE S9

Upmeter server is restarting too often.

Restarts for the last hour: {{ $value }}.

Upmeter server should not restart too often. It should always be running and collecting episodes. Check its logs to find the problem: kubectl -n d8-upmeter logs -f upmeter-0 upmeter
D8UpmeterServerReplicasUnavailable CE S6

One or more Upmeter server pods is NOT Running

Check StatefulSet status: kubectl -n d8-upmeter get statefulset upmeter -o json | jq .status

Check the status of its pod: kubectl -n d8-upmeter get pods upmeter-0 -o json | jq '.items[] | {(.metadata.name):.status}'
D8UpmeterSmokeMiniMoreThanOnePVxPVC CE S9

Unnecessary smoke-mini volumes in cluster

The number of unnecessary smoke-mini PVs: {{ $value }}.

Smoke-mini PVs should be deleted when released. Probably smoke-mini storage class has Retain policy by default, or there is CSI/cloud issue.

These PVs have no valuable data on them an should be deleted.

The list of PVs: kubectl get pv | grep disk-smoke-mini.
D8UpmeterTooManyHookProbeObjects CE S9

Too many UpmeterHookProbe objects in cluster

Average UpmeterHookProbe count per upmeter-agent pod is {{ $value }}, but should be strictly 1.

Some of the objects were left by old upmeter-agent pods due to Upmeter update or downscale.

Leave only newest objects corresponding to upmeter-agent pods, when the reason it investigated.

See kubectl get upmeterhookprobes.deckhouse.io.

Module user-authn

D8DexAllTargetsDown CE S6
Prometheus is unable to scrape Dex metrics.

The list of alerts

Module admission-policy-engine

Module cert-manager

Module chrony

Module cloud-provider-yandex

Module cni-cilium

Module control-plane-manager

Module documentation

Module extended-monitoring

Module flow-schema

Module ingress-nginx

Module istio

Module kube-dns

Module l2-load-balancer

Module log-shipper

Module metallb

Module monitoring-applications

Module monitoring-custom

Module monitoring-deckhouse

Module monitoring-kubernetes

Module monitoring-kubernetes-control-plane

Module monitoring-ping

Module node-manager

Module okmeter

Module operator-prometheus

Module prometheus

Module runtime-audit-engine

Module secret-copier

Module snapshot-controller

Module terraform-manager

Module upmeter

Module user-authn

Request trial access

Thank you

Error

Request callback

Thank you

Something went wrong

Book your sessions

Thank you

Error

Request demo

Thank you

Error

Get the PCI SSC Compliance Report

Thank you

Error